Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: May 31, 2024, 12:47 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
Kent Hovind! That is the cherry ontop of the cake Hilarious
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 19, 2014 at 2:54 pm)Stimbo Wrote: You've never seen the word "torture" written down before, have you?

Apparently not.
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 19, 2014 at 3:41 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q8DDIe_2cHM


Have you just posted a kent hovind video?
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
I could make a video with a hundred reasons why that video is stupid.
"We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid." ~ Benjamin Franklin
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
100 ways to misrepresent evolution because I'm a moron who is too lazy to actually learn about it.

I mean, the basics really aren't that hard. Come on guys, get a grip.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
Due to limited time, I'm just going to address the babbling nonsense of the Trinity for now and get to the mental gymnastics you performed to try to reconcile all the different resurrection accounts later.

(December 19, 2014 at 12:36 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: Duh, we already established that they are separate beings, which in itself is not a disqualification of being God. Next...
So, is there one god or are there three?

You can't have it both ways. Either Christianity is monotheistic or it's polytheistic.

If Jesus is a "separate being" from his father god then he's not the same being, by definition. This makes him a god separate from his father, his father being a greater god perhaps but a separate god.

Quote:The subordination is just the rank and or roles between the two, that says nothing about Deity.
If they have different "ranks" and "roles", they are separate beings and so different gods. One is a lesser god and the other a greater god. So Christianity is polytheistic.

If, on the other hand, they are the same god, they can't have separate wills and one can't be subordinate to the other. They'd be the same person. It's like you lording over yourself. So Jesus doesn't just talk to himself, he tells himself to do things he doesn't want to do.

Can there be a better qualification of a particularly dangerous form of insanity? So he's a crazy god then?

Quote:The attribute of omniscience was given to Jesus in John 21:15-17, after Jesus asked Peter three times do he love him, and after the third time Peter said "Lord, you know all things; you know that I love you". Jesus didn't say "I don't know all things, Peter, only the Father knows all things", he simply accepted the attribute because it was true.
So if Jesus doesn't know what his father knows, he's a separate being and thus a lesser god. If he's part of the same being, he'd share the same body of knowledge.

Perhaps you're suggesting that your god has multiple personality disorder?We could add that to the list of psychological problems Yahweh has.

Quote:That was just Jesus' way of saying "If there is a less painful way for me to do this, then please, may I do it that way?"
Do you see where this is insane?

He's talking to himself, asking himself if there's any way he can convince himself to change a rule he made in the first place and forgive us all for being such sinful beings (which we are because an ancestor of ours who was made from a rib ate a magic fruit after speaking with a talking snake but I digress). His alternate personality told him no, that he had to make himself bleed and die on a cross because otherwise there's no way he could convince himself to forgive us.

So Jesus is hearing voices telling him to do suicidal things? Voices that are him but not?

This is barking madness.

Quote:If Jesus lived his whole life without sin, how is that not good?
Because of how "sin" is defined. Since "sin" is acting contrary to the will of your god and Jesus is your god then Jesus wills what he wills and does what he does. This is a meaningless tautology.

Quote:The Father is speaking in reference to the Son, no problems there.
...in third person. So he's a separate being and thus a separate god.

Quote:He is both God and man.
Contradiction. Which is he?

Quote:He is God in the body of a human.
So Jesus is God in a human suit then? This is the ancient pagan concept of the "avatar". When gods come to earth, they assume a human form. The human form is but a shell, a vehicle and nothing more. So Jesus should then know all God knows and will what God wills.

If Jesus has an inferior set of knowledge and a subordinate will, he's not God in the body of a human.

Quote:Doesn't matter, all we need is one Gospel to say it, and John does...and the union is very clear..all you have to do is read John 1:1, and unless you have a New World's Translation of the scriptures (Jehovah Witness's bible), it is very clear.
The point is the earliest of the Gospels make it clear Jesus is a separate being with a subordinate will and an inferior set of knowledge who refers to his father in 3rd person and prays to him in 2nd person.

Later, the ideas of developing Christianity would be reworked to try to resolve the issue of a divine intercessor who forgives sins with a strict Jewish monotheistic view who's god doesn't tolerate that. Thus the Gospel of John was written.

Quote:Second, the fact that Jesus lived a perfectly sinless life implies that he is God, as that is a something that only God can do.
A meaningless tautology since all you're saying is Jesus wills what he wills and does what he does.





Quote:Makes sense to me and everyone else that believes in the Holy Trinity.
Great! Explain it then.

If you can't explain it, you don't understand it.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
Please be a poe? Pretty please?

ETA: Not you DP, we already know you are the YITW poe, you are just pretending to be an atheist Big Grin
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
Is there an operation that christians get which allows their brain to accept the trinity? It's the only explanation left.

I agree, the trinity sounds like a classic case of multiple personality disorder or flat out insanity.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
(December 19, 2014 at 2:54 pm)Stimbo Wrote: You've never seen the word "torture" written down before, have you?

Trying to follow what he's written down IS torture.
Atheist Forums Hall of Shame:
"The trinity can be equated to having your cake and eating it too."
...      -Lucent, trying to defend the Trinity concept
"(Yahweh's) actions are good because (Yahweh) is the ultimate standard of goodness. That’s not begging the question"
...       -Statler Waldorf, Christian apologist
Reply
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)


If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god.  If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  To Atheists: Who, in your opinion, was Jesus Christ? JJoseph 50 2355 January 9, 2024 at 4:28 am
Last Post: no one
  The power of Christ... zwanzig 60 4644 August 30, 2023 at 8:33 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Jesus Christ is the Beast 666 Satan Emerald_Eyes_Esoteric 36 8101 December 18, 2022 at 10:33 am
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Creating Christ JML 26 3248 September 29, 2022 at 9:40 pm
Last Post: Jehanne
  So has Christ returned TheClearCleanStuff 31 3445 May 20, 2022 at 12:35 pm
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  CHRIST THE KICKER…… BrianSoddingBoru4 15 1486 January 3, 2022 at 10:00 am
Last Post: brewer
  CHRIST THE KILLER..... ronedee 31 3556 December 26, 2021 at 7:11 pm
Last Post: Ferrocyanide
Rainbow Why I believe in Jesus Christ Ai Somoto 20 2865 June 30, 2021 at 4:25 pm
Last Post: Nay_Sayer
  In what way is the Resurrection the best explanation? GrandizerII 159 16075 November 25, 2019 at 6:46 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  Consecrated virgins: 'I got married to Christ' zebo-the-fat 11 2063 December 7, 2018 at 7:03 pm
Last Post: Angrboda



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)