RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 23, 2014 at 3:33 pm
So, I'm wondering if the OP has earned a spot in the Hall of Shame?
MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
|
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 23, 2014 at 3:33 pm
So, I'm wondering if the OP has earned a spot in the Hall of Shame?
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 23, 2014 at 3:36 pm
It's kind of an auto thing.
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 23, 2014 at 3:37 pm
(December 23, 2014 at 3:33 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: So, I'm wondering if the OP has earned a spot in the Hall of Shame? He's up there at least with one quote. The one about King Tut's existence not being proven. RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 23, 2014 at 3:38 pm
(December 23, 2014 at 3:33 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: So, I'm wondering if the OP has earned a spot in the Hall of Shame? This entire thread is an honorary inductee. RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 23, 2014 at 3:41 pm
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 23, 2014 at 4:13 pm
(December 23, 2014 at 3:37 pm)abaris Wrote:(December 23, 2014 at 3:33 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: So, I'm wondering if the OP has earned a spot in the Hall of Shame? ...wut?
"I was thirsty for everything, but blood wasn't my style" - Live, "Voodoo Lady"
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 23, 2014 at 4:16 pm
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 23, 2014 at 4:29 pm
We've certainly had some winners come and go in 2014. H_M was just the last of a long, inglorious line of knucklehead apologists. My favorite was that creeper last spring who spent multiple pages setting the parameters of debates that never happened -- at least when he wasn't busy stalking Deidre.
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 23, 2014 at 4:43 pm
(December 23, 2014 at 3:37 pm)abaris Wrote:(December 23, 2014 at 3:33 pm)Parkers Tan Wrote: So, I'm wondering if the OP has earned a spot in the Hall of Shame? I thought when he upped the ante to George Washington being unprovable he pretty much jumped the shark. There's no way you can earn respect after writing shit that stupid. RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 23, 2014 at 4:47 pm
It's all part of the mantra:
"There's more evidence for Jesus than for..." (fill in the blank) Repeat until you get to an historical figure with whom your opponent isn't familiar. Yay, you win!
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|