Posts: 1114
Threads: 28
Joined: June 13, 2011
Reputation:
18
RE: Guardian angel saves baby
March 15, 2015 at 2:09 am
(This post was last modified: March 15, 2015 at 2:09 am by Pizza.)
Becca, It's okay for him to be not inquisitive because faith or something.
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot
We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Posts: 25314
Threads: 239
Joined: August 26, 2010
Reputation:
156
RE: Guardian angel saves baby
March 15, 2015 at 3:38 am
If I had posted this with the title "Alien saves baby", Drich, what would you have said about me?
At the age of five, Skagra decided emphatically that God did not exist. This revelation tends to make most people in the universe who have it react in one of two ways - with relief or with despair. Only Skagra responded to it by thinking, 'Wait a second. That means there's a situation vacant.'
Posts: 138
Threads: 3
Joined: March 30, 2014
Reputation:
5
RE: Guardian angel saves baby
March 15, 2015 at 7:32 am
(March 15, 2015 at 12:44 am)Drich Wrote: (March 14, 2015 at 3:04 pm)coldwx Wrote: So apparently there is a video of this rescue. I have watched several cuts of it and nowhere do you hear a voice and I also don't hear any first responders talking about "I hear a voice" or "Someone is calling for help". If there is and I am not hearing it or seeing it please correct me.
Page 8 post 72, you stand corrected.
Do you remember what I said earlier about thinking through your posts before you press post reply? The video I was speaking of is officer body cam video that was just released. The post you made on page 8, #72 references an interview. This is not the same video. Are you still going to claim you corrected me?
Now we have a video that clearly shows the moments before the rescue and captures the audio. Excuses in 3, 2, 1,....
"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. "
Posts: 2344
Threads: 79
Joined: November 18, 2014
Reputation:
42
RE: Guardian angel saves baby
March 15, 2015 at 10:00 am
Drich, the video you posted only had the interview. I have not watch the video from the rescuers.
It would be wonderful if the love of this baby's mother could have somehow denied even death to make certain her baby was safe. I want it to be true but there is no evidence that it actually happened . If the officers really didn't acknowledge the voice while trying to save the mom, then they must have lied
Posts: 4196
Threads: 60
Joined: September 8, 2011
Reputation:
30
RE: Guardian angel saves baby
March 15, 2015 at 10:34 am
(March 15, 2015 at 10:00 am)Nope Wrote: If the officers really didn't acknowledge the voice while trying to save the mom, then they must have lied They may not have lied. Memory is defective in that it is influenced by what we want to remember. There may have been a 'voice-like' sound, catbird or something, and after the fact, memory recalled a human voice calling out. This has been proven in a plethora of experiments. In between the theists and the courts, however, this empirical fact is ignored.
You make people miserable and there's nothing they can do about it, just like god.
-- Homer Simpson
God has no place within these walls, just as facts have no place within organized religion.
-- Superintendent Chalmers
Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends. There are some things we don't want to know. Important things.
-- Ned Flanders
Once something's been approved by the government, it's no longer immoral.
-- The Rev Lovejoy
Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
104
RE: Guardian angel saves baby
March 15, 2015 at 10:43 am
(March 15, 2015 at 12:56 am)rexbeccarox Wrote: (March 15, 2015 at 12:44 am)Drich Wrote: It's ironice that you want to be known as 'inquisitive' when clearly you have already made up your mind..
And you haven't? The title of this thread... your thread is "Guardian Angel Saves Baby".
Posts: 8711
Threads: 128
Joined: March 1, 2012
Reputation:
54
RE: Guardian angel saves baby
March 15, 2015 at 11:02 am
(March 15, 2015 at 12:44 am)Drich Wrote: It's funny how 'atheists' demand proof of stuff like this and when it has been provided you all avoid it like the plague or as the noob tried to pretend it does not exist. That's because the so-called free-thinkers are anything but. It is the same situation for NDE''s. The best evidence by the most serious researchers provides compelling proof, but they won't have any of it. There are more than a dozen natural "explanations" for NDEs and they are all inconsistent, speculative, and do not account for all the phenomena. When presented with evidence for something that doesn't fit their small minded box of how the world should work they will accept anything, however speculative, to deny that maybe, just maybe, the world is a little more rational than suggested by materialism. They're indigenous hypocrites at worse and willfully ignorant at best.
Posts: 33147
Threads: 1412
Joined: March 15, 2013
Reputation:
152
RE: Guardian angel saves baby
March 15, 2015 at 11:12 am
(March 15, 2015 at 12:44 am)Drich Wrote: It's funny how 'atheists' demand proof of stuff like this and when it has been provided you all avoid it like the plague or as the noob tried to pretend it does not exist.
I could understand if actual evidence had been provided and not that which your deluded mind erronously interprets as evidence.
"Never trust a fox. Looks like a dog, behaves like a cat."
~ Erin Hunter
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Guardian angel saves baby
March 15, 2015 at 11:37 am
(March 15, 2015 at 11:02 am)ChadWooters Wrote: That's because the so-called free-thinkers are anything but. It is the same situation for NDE''s. The best evidence by the most serious researchers provides compelling proof, but they won't have any of it. There are more than a dozen natural "explanations" for NDEs and they are all inconsistent, speculative, and do not account for all the phenomena.
Yeah, and the religious explanation isn't at all inconsistent- funnily enough, NDEs always seem to confirm the religion of the person having them, not some consistent religion- or speculative- you certainly don't have any evidence of an afterlife, making the explanation... speculative- and account for all the phenomena- except for the real ones when NDES are tested and the people experiencing them fail to have any awareness of things they should be, if they had truly left their body.
In the best efforts of researchers has turned up no evidence of an afterlife, or god, or anything like that. You can't turn to the research when (you think) it confirms what you believe- and don't think we missed that you didn't cite any research, you just asserted it was there, as usual- and ignore this entirely pertinent point.
Quote: When presented with evidence for something that doesn't fit their small minded box of how the world should work they will accept anything, however speculative, to deny that maybe, just maybe, the world is a little more rational than suggested by materialism. They're indigenous hypocrites at worse and willfully ignorant at best.
Chad, you don't present evidence. You never present evidence. You do just what you've done here, just what I criticized all the theists in this thread for, when you avoid the real conversation that could go on here in favor of fiat assertion and petty, condescending grandstanding.
But you aren't in an intractable asshole contest, you're in a thread discussing the supernatural, and now you're in fact lying, because as I've already pointed out, atheism does not deny the supernatural, we just need more evidence than the rhetorical tricks ("they're just close minded!") you use in place of evidence, in a petty attempt to poison the well rather than provide anything substantial.
The only point you've had from atheists thus far is that aggressive condescension isn't an argument, and literally every theist in here seems incapable of seeing a difference between the two. You're all just embarrassing yourselves, but you're too smugly stuck up your own asses to see it.
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 6990
Threads: 89
Joined: January 6, 2012
Reputation:
104
RE: Guardian angel saves baby
March 15, 2015 at 12:02 pm
(This post was last modified: March 15, 2015 at 12:15 pm by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(March 15, 2015 at 11:02 am)ChadWooters Wrote: (March 15, 2015 at 12:44 am)Drich Wrote: It's funny how 'atheists' demand proof of stuff like this and when it has been provided you all avoid it like the plague or as the noob tried to pretend it does not exist. That's because the so-called free-thinkers are anything but. It is the same situation for NDE''s. The best evidence by the most serious researchers provides compelling proof, but they won't have any of it. There are more than a dozen natural "explanations" for NDEs and they are all inconsistent, speculative, and do not account for all the phenomena. When presented with evidence for something that doesn't fit their small minded box of how the world should work they will accept anything, however speculative, to deny that maybe, just maybe, the world is a little more rational than suggested by materialism. They're indigenous hypocrites at worse and willfully ignorant at best.
Oh whatever man. Just utter tripe over and over.
Lest we forget that it's the theist contingent who are failing to provide any evidence of critical thinking skills in this thread, as evident to anyone who reads it.
All you've done here is snipe with nonsensical comments about how nobody should ask any questions, just take whatever conclusion that's offered first and accept it. Fucking hell a 6 year old wouldn't settle for that. You don't just say ''and it was an angel and that's proven by a 'voice' that someone may or may not have heard." No evidence, no research, no methodology about how one would even go about testing this claim. Nothing. Just accept it. And the fact that we don't just believe it marks us as closed minded? Yeah, ok mate, in your weird twisted reality maybe.
Another ridiculous thread. I have to remind my self constantly recently that you guys are actually adults who presumably have some semblance of formative understanding of how the world works.
|