I remember talking to one of my friends, normally an intelligent guy, about homosexuality. All he kept saying is, "I can't understand why you'd want a dick up your arse." And I'd say, "That's because you're not gay." Then he'd repeat his bit...

Any kind of sexual attraction, examined objectively, will seem utterly weird except as part of evolution.

This guy is a true and complete fucktard:

Quote:Anal or oral intercourse between human beings, or any sexual relations between a human being and an animal, the act of which may be punishable as a criminal offense.

Source

According to his proposed bill, everyone in California who has ever had anal or oral sex no matter the gender of the partner would be guilty under this bill.

Welcome to California
Population: 12

Good thing this fuckwad is just a lawyer, and not an elected official.

This, honestly, seems Poe-ish.

(March 23, 2015 at 6:10 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: This guy is a true and complete fucktard:

Quote:Anal or oral intercourse between human beings, or any sexual relations between a human being and an animal, the act of which may be punishable as a criminal offense.

Source

According to his proposed bill, everyone in California who has ever had anal or oral sex no matter the gender of the partner would be guilty under this bill.

Welcome to California
Population: 12

Line me up against the wall ... I'm not giving up eating pussy.

(March 23, 2015 at 7:08 pm)SteelCurtain Wrote: Good thing this fuckwad is just a lawyer, and not an elected official.

This, honestly, seems Poe-ish.

It came from NBC but I would be relieved if they made a mistake and the lawyer is playing some weird joke on everyone.

(March 23, 2015 at 9:37 pm)Nope Wrote: It came from NBC but I would be relieved if they made a mistake and the lawyer is playing some weird joke on everyone.

In California, anyone with $200 can write and submit ballot initiative and present it to the State Attorney General.

An attorney with a point to prove might shell out the $200 to lampoon super fundies. It just seems too out there to be earnest, to me.

Hmm... To get it to be a law, he needs signatures. Maybe he just wants a list of all the people who would support something like this.

(Then, two months in the future, someone who signed the petition gets fired, and cries about getting persecuted for their belief that gays should be rounded up and shot)

(March 23, 2015 at 8:55 am)vorlon13 Wrote:

---

After the Christers kill all the queers, they are going after all the shrimp eaters. And then the remarried divorced people.

And given that Evangelicals have the highest rates of divorce of any religious group, that could result in them thinning their own numbers.

Also, I love it how they want to put Old Testament punishments into action without putting Old Testament jurisprudence into action. According to Wikipedia, here are just a few of the conditions that needed to be met in order for a conviction in a capital case:


It requires two witnesses who observed the crime. The accused would been given a chance and if repeated the same crime or any other it would lead into a death sentence. If witnesses had been caught lying about the crime they would be executed.
Two witnesses were required. Acceptability was limited to:
Adult Jewish men who were known to keep the commandments, knew the written and oral law, and had legitimate professions;
The witnesses had to see each other at the time of the sin;
The witnesses had to be able to speak clearly, without any speech impediment or hearing deficit (to ensure that the warning and the response were done);
The witnesses could not be related to each other or to the accused.
The witnesses had to see each other, and both of them had to give a warning (hatra'ah) to the person that the sin they were about to commit was a capital offense;
This warning had to be delivered within seconds of the performance of the sin (in the time it took to say, "Peace unto you, my Rabbi and my Master");
In the same amount of time, the person about to sin had to:
Respond that s/he was familiar with the punishment, but they were going to sin anyway; AND
Begin to commit the sin/crime;
The Beth Din had to examine each witness separately; and if even one point of their evidence was contradictory - even if a very minor point, such as eye color - the evidence was considered contradictory and the evidence was not heeded;
The Beth Din had to consist of minimally 23 judges;
The majority could not be a simple majority - the split verdict that would allow conviction had to be at least 13 to 11 in favor of conviction;
If the Beth Din arrived at a unanimous verdict of guilty, the person was let go - the idea being that if no judge could find anything exculpatory about the accused, there was something wrong with the court.[4]
The witnesses were appointed by the court to be the executioners.

Needless to say, this eventually ended in the Jews abandoning capital punishment in the first century AD.

Well, they got something right. That, and hummus.

(March 23, 2015 at 10:02 pm)TRJF Wrote: Hmm... To get it to be a law, he needs signatures. Maybe he just wants a list of all the people who would support something like this.

(Then, two months in the future, someone who signed the petition gets fired, and cries about getting persecuted for their belief that gays should be rounded up and shot)

Exactly. He would still need the AG to write it up into an actual ballot initiative, but if it got written up, he would then need signatures from 8% of the total number of voters that voted in the last gubernatorial election.

That list of signers would be golden.