Posts: 8731
Threads: 425
Joined: October 7, 2014
Reputation:
37
A hypothetical question for Atheists and Christians
July 12, 2015 at 3:42 am
Let's say its the it's close to being the end times, would you either A get on the first space ship off the planet or B stay.
Sure as fuck i am choosing A they can have the planet.
Atheism is a non-prophet organization join today.
Code:
<iframe width="100%" height="450" scrolling="no" frameborder="no" src="https://w.soundcloud.com/player/?url=https%3A//api.soundcloud.com/tracks/255506953&auto_play=false&hide_related=false&show_comments=true&show_user=true&show_reposts=false&visual=true"></iframe>
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: A hypothetical question for Atheists and Christians
July 12, 2015 at 4:22 am
(This post was last modified: July 12, 2015 at 4:22 am by robvalue.)
Well, if the end times involve spending eternity with the God of the bible as the best case scenario, then I'll get on the space ship.
Posts: 20476
Threads: 447
Joined: June 16, 2014
Reputation:
111
RE: A hypothetical question for Atheists and Christians
July 12, 2015 at 5:22 am
That is a funny concept...
It's like that "Mental As Anything" song "If you leave me, can I come too?"
I dare say, the reason for the end times is to end the sinful inhabitants, not the endangered yellow bellied parrot!
Either God knows where you're going, (he DID create all the other planets? yes, no?), and he's gonna fuck you from afar, or he really IS that stupid!
No God, No fear.
Know God, Know fear.
Posts: 46480
Threads: 543
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: A hypothetical question for Atheists and Christians
July 12, 2015 at 8:45 am
I'd stay. The odds of living through the destruction of a planet and staying alive on a spaceship long enough to reach a second planet are roughly equal: nil.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
Posts: 30129
Threads: 304
Joined: April 18, 2014
Reputation:
92
RE: A hypothetical question for Atheists and Christians
July 12, 2015 at 1:49 pm
I've looked into some of the concepts worked up by Dyson on the big Orion interstellar craft. Of several difficulties, paying for it seems to be the deal killer, not technical impossibility.
If EM drive turns out to be feasible (I am skeptical so far) we might want to dust off some of the late 50s/60s Orion design studies.
Anyone want to vacation on Enceladus ??
The granting of a pardon is an imputation of guilt, and the acceptance a confession of it.
Posts: 46480
Threads: 543
Joined: July 24, 2013
Reputation:
109
RE: A hypothetical question for Atheists and Christians
July 12, 2015 at 4:13 pm
Some problems I see with moving our entire species (or even a sizable portion of it) off planet:
1. Where to go: The only fit piece of real estate for human beings in this vicinity happens to be the one we're standing on (forget terraforming, it isn't going to happen) and extra-solar planets are impossibly far away.
2. How to get there: Leaving aside for now the problem of getting all the way to an Earth-like planet, it would take about 40 billion gigajoules of energy just to get us out of Earth's gravity well (that's just for the people). This is, very roughly, the equivalent of the world's remaining oil reserves (and no, I'm not proposing oil-fired rocket ships). Source: The kid across the street who's taking his physics degree.
3. How to pay for it: Even if only half the people on Earth wanted to leave, that's going to be around 5 billion (the population has a nasty habit of growing). Let's be generous and assume you could cram 10 000 people into a single ship. You're going to need a half million space ships. Figuring the one of the US space shuttles (Endeavour) cost $1.7 billion US dollars to build, we can extrapolate - not adjusting for inflation - that one of our planet evacuating ships could easily cost around two and a half trillion. And you'd need to build and fuel a half million of them.
Nope. Everyone's staying, like it or not.
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax