Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: April 24, 2024, 5:25 am

Poll: What difference to you would proof of the resurrection make?
This poll is closed.
No difference. Life carries on as before.
46.67%
14 46.67%
It would make some difference.
23.33%
7 23.33%
It would make a lot of difference.
30.00%
9 30.00%
Total 30 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Atheists: would proof of the resurrection matter to you?
#1
Question 
Atheists: would proof of the resurrection matter to you?
Let's assume that somehow it was proved beyond reasonable doubt that there was a real, single historical person who Jesus was loosely based on, and that he really did come back to life after being dead for 3 days. What difference would this make to you, other than learning such a thing is possible?

To me it would make no difference.

Whoops typo in the poll question. How do I change it?
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.

Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Reply
#2
RE: Atheists: would proof of the resurrection matter to you?
None whatsoever, in terms of belief itself.

I'll throw in miracles, the gospels as eye witness accounts and a 100% historical reliability of the NT and take away all the contradictions, too. Does nothing for sky daddy, does nothing for religion, does nothing for me.

That is, if you could actually prove the resurrection of a long deceased dubiously historical figure. But for that, you'd need evidence. Rolleyes
Reply
#3
RE: Atheists: would proof of the ressurection matter to you?
Nothing.  It wouldn't prove a god, it wouldn't even show the Jesus of the proven resurrection is in anyway out of ordinary.

It is not unheard of people to fall into a state that in the pre-modern era would be indistinguishable from being dead, with no trivially detectable pulse or breathing, and then revive after a couple of days. By modern standards they were never dead and were always detectably alive.   By back water of Roman Empire standards they may well have been considered dead for the lack of sophistication to tell the difference.   Such ocurances might thoroughly awe some illiterate Iron Age yokel, but nothing modern medicine would raise eyebrow over.

In fact, some gurus in India have mastered the ability to go into this pseudo death state on demand.    Pseudo death also occurs with sufficient regularity upon ingestion of certain types of naturally occurring neural toxin that in parts of the world where such toxins are often found, like in certain sea food, there are taboos against burying the dead for 3 days if the appearently dead is known to have eaten sources of such toxin, on the off chance the seeming dead would revive as they some times do.
Reply
#4
RE: Atheists: would proof of the resurrection matter to you?
Of course it wouldn't matter. This shit is still happening today!

Grandmother 'comes back from the dead just minutes before post-mortem' after spending THREE DAYS in the morgue
The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than that a drunken man is happier than a sober one. ~ George Bernard Shaw
Reply
#5
RE: Atheists: would proof of the resurrection matter to you?
Let me get this straight?
Proven that a guy, beaten to a pulp, whipped till his back is raw flesh, with nails hammered through his hands and feet, left hanging for a few hours until suffocation would kill him, then speared through the heart and lungs to make sure he's really as dead as they come.... and 3 days later this same guy is seen walking around as if nothing had happened, except for the holes in his hands?
This kind of resurrection?

Or the kind that Ashground just showed of the grandmother who took a very deep and long nap and then woke up?

Not proof of any god, but I'd be interested in examining such a body... for science, of course!
Reply
#6
RE: Atheists: would proof of the resurrection matter to you?
Reasonable proof that a human had been dead for three days (not in a coma or condition that looks like death but isn't - these would come under reasonable doubt) then came back to life - proof beyond reasonable doubt that the laws of physics have been broken - that would be MEGA - never mind any Jesus nonsense.

Regards Grimesy
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful. — Edward Gibbon

Reply
#7
RE: Atheists: would proof of the resurrection matter to you?
I'd immediately walk down to the local preacher and buy him that Ferrari he deserves.
Reply
#8
RE: Atheists: would proof of the resurrection matter to you?
If undeniable proof is found of an actual dead person being resurrected after three days, then I'd start believing in Frankenstein and look into possibilities of creating zombies. Tongue
Quote:To know yet to think that one does not know is best; Not to know yet to think that one knows will lead to difficulty.
- Lau Tzu

Join me on atheistforums Slack Cool Shades (pester tibs via pm if you need invite) Tongue

Reply
#9
RE: Atheists: would proof of the resurrection matter to you?
(July 16, 2015 at 6:11 am)robvalue Wrote: Let's assume that somehow it was proved beyond reasonable doubt that there was a real, single historical person who Jesus was loosely based on, and that he really did come back to life after being dead for 3 days. What difference would this make to you, other than learning such a thing is possible?
[...]

Learning that it's possible to determine with any level of certainty, whether or not a human was dead for 3 days, 2000 years ago - well, that would be amazing. Yay, science!
"The fact that a believer is happier than a skeptic is no more to the point than the fact that a drunken man is happier than a sober one." - George Bernard Shaw
Reply
#10
RE: Atheists: would proof of the resurrection matter to you?
It wouldn't make a difference to me because after all has been said and done, at the end of the day, gawd (if there was one) would still be an asshole and I'd still be walking around doing what I do.

Carry on.
Disclaimer: I am only responsible for what I say, not what you choose to understand. 
(November 14, 2018 at 8:57 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: Have a good day at work.  If we ever meet in a professional setting, let me answer your question now.  Yes, I DO want fries with that.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Dear Atheists: what would convince you God/Christ is Real? JJoseph 207 10353 February 12, 2024 at 1:51 am
Last Post: Goosebump
  The Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. Nishant Xavier 38 2476 August 7, 2023 at 10:24 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Why the resurrection accounts are not evidence LinuxGal 5 1047 October 29, 2022 at 2:01 pm
Last Post: LinuxGal
  Atheists: What if Trump addressed your issues in America. Would you vote for him? Sanau 38 4453 March 30, 2020 at 8:15 pm
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  God, Energy and Matter Lek 323 24528 October 15, 2019 at 1:58 am
Last Post: Anomalocaris
  Which religion would be easiest for you if you had to be in one? Fake Messiah 31 3192 July 17, 2019 at 2:26 am
Last Post: Losty
  Atheists: What would you say to a dying child who asks you if they'll go to heaven? DodosAreDead 91 11350 November 2, 2018 at 9:07 pm
Last Post: LadyForCamus
  Response to Darkmatter2525 ""Why Does Anything Matter?" Eik0932 23 2864 September 26, 2018 at 12:08 pm
Last Post: Angrboda
  Two Myths I Wish Atheists Would Stop Buying Into Rhondazvous 26 4620 June 7, 2018 at 8:21 pm
Last Post: chimp3
  If you could replace god with satan, would you? Foxaèr 37 6520 April 28, 2018 at 10:02 pm
Last Post: Amarok



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)