Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 13, 2024, 7:17 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Dawkins' Debate Rejections
#21
RE: Dawkins' Debate Rejections
(August 9, 2015 at 12:35 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:
(August 9, 2015 at 4:53 am)Alex K Wrote: ... This is exascerbated by the fact that he is really not a very skilled debater. ...

Yes, debating is a skill, so that who appears to "win" a debate is not necessarily the one who is most reasonable or is speaking the truth.  Indeed, bold lying can be an effective strategy in a debate.  I would never do a formal public debate with anyone about anything.

Anyone who is serious about a topic should research it rather than just listen to a debate about it.  Who "wins" a debate is more about the debaters than about the subject under discussion.
I've heard people evaluate debates based on who converted the most people in the audience to their side. Which is bizarre. If most of the audience believes Christian theism is true and are Craig fans, I don't see  what Craig and his ilk actually do but entertain their fans and fellow tribe members. Different strokes for different folks, I guess. I like the occasional debate but I'm not as big a fan of them these days. Like you and others have said they are more about sound bites and zingers than content.
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot

We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Reply
#22
RE: Dawkins' Debate Rejections
Don't give them attention. They'll feel like their delusion has some validity in real life Undecided
Reply
#23
RE: Dawkins' Debate Rejections
(August 9, 2015 at 12:35 pm)Pyrrho Wrote:
(August 9, 2015 at 4:53 am)Alex K Wrote: ... This is exascerbated by the fact that he is really not a very skilled debater. ...

Yes, debating is a skill, so that who appears to "win" a debate is not necessarily the one who is most reasonable or is speaking the truth.  Indeed, bold lying can be an effective strategy in a debate.  I would never do a formal public debate with anyone about anything.

Anyone who is serious about a topic should research it rather than just listen to a debate about it.  Who "wins" a debate is more about the debaters than about the subject under discussion.

Very good point. Formal debates are an artificial construct allowing people on the wrong side to employ tactics effective at "winning over" the ignorant listeners.

Formal debates are only useful when both participants participate in good faith to show that their point of view has the most merit from a scientific point of view - and when the audience is educated enough on the subject to see through the bullshit. Otherwise, it's a farce.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.

Albert Einstein
Reply
#24
RE: Dawkins' Debate Rejections
(August 9, 2015 at 6:36 am)abaris Wrote: I understand his standpoint. There are some debates not worth having. I think, all these debates are overrated anyway. They don't change anyone's mind and they're the equivalent of preeching to the quire for each participant.

Perhaps the biggest problem though is that serious scientific questions are not solved in a debate setting.  Creationists learned back in the 80s that the way to "win" a debate was to engage in the Gish gallop, throw as many ridiculous things out at the beginning and since these assertions take time to answer, time that doesn't exist in a debate setting, the creationist can always declare victory because the scientist supposedly "can't answer the questions".  I don't blame Dawkins for not debating them. I refuse to even talk to them anymore, they're all blatantly dishonest.
There is nothing demonstrably true that religion can provide mankind that cannot be achieved as well or better through secular means.
Bitch at my blog! Follow me on Twitter! Subscribe to my YouTube channel!
Reply
#25
RE: Dawkins' Debate Rejections
Debate is overrated. Someone can be a brilliant debater and still be totally wrong. Why even bother. I would do the same as Dawkins.
[Image: dcep7c.jpg]
Reply
#26
RE: Dawkins' Debate Rejections
Atheist demonstrates how there isn't any evidence for an invisible man in the sky. Theist continues his/her script, not listening to one thing the atheist says. Many audience members think they've both made good points, when in fact, they haven't.

Good choice Dawkins; you do have more important things to do. The theists will ridicule you, but that's because they are too butthurt, because every single argument of theirs has failed miserably, and they are completely out of them.. WHY? Because there is no evidence for a god. End of debate.
Anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.' -Isaac Asimov-
Reply
#27
RE: Dawkins' Debate Rejections
(August 9, 2015 at 1:15 pm)Pizza Wrote: I've heard people evaluate debates based on who converted the most people in the audience to their side.

Personally I think debates are the perfect example of mirror jerking. And I don't think they do convert that many people to one side or the other. The fans of the debaters want their darling to win and in their perception they will see them win whatever happens.

Same goes for political debates for that matter.
[Image: Bumper+Sticker+-+Asheville+-+Praise+Dog3.JPG]
Reply
#28
RE: Dawkins' Debate Rejections
Craig is master of the Gish gallop. That is true.
It is very important not to mistake hemlock for parsley, but to believe or not believe in God is not important at all. - Denis Diderot

We are the United States of Amnesia, we learn nothing because we remember nothing. - Gore Vidal
Reply
#29
RE: Dawkins' Debate Rejections
I personally would find it quite enjoyable to watch a debate between someone like Dawkins and a proponent of ID. I don't think there is anything inherently stupid in the notion that complexity at the microscopic level of biological structures cannot be accounted for by the traditional explanations of evolutionary theory, and reflect something of an ingenious program.
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply
#30
RE: Dawkins' Debate Rejections
(August 10, 2015 at 7:12 am)Nestor Wrote: I personally would find it quite enjoyable to watch a debate between someone like Dawkins and a proponent of ID. I don't think there is anything inherently stupid in the notion that complexity at the microscopic level of biological structures cannot be accounted for by the traditional explanations of evolutionary theory, and reflect something of an ingenious program.

It could be interesting, but Dawkins isn't good enough. I'd pick Coyne.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition

Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Dawkins, Rowling, Sunak et al on Trans Issue and Women's Rights. Nishant Xavier 63 5256 July 15, 2023 at 12:50 am
Last Post: Paleophyte
  Dawkins loses humanist title Silver 165 11986 June 6, 2021 at 1:45 am
Last Post: Peebothuhlu
  Richard Dawkins interviews Saudi Arabian atheist Rana Ahmad AniKoferBo 2 952 July 22, 2020 at 12:40 pm
Last Post: Brian37
  Ricky Gervais won Dawkins award this year Fake Messiah 13 2935 September 6, 2019 at 8:25 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Dawkins writing kid's version of "The God Delusion" - you mad bro? Silver 35 7488 August 2, 2018 at 9:08 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Geoff Robson has a hardon for Dawkins Silver 7 1966 May 10, 2018 at 5:55 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  What are your thoughts on Richard Dawkins? NuclearEnergy 96 16126 December 6, 2017 at 3:06 am
Last Post: Bow Before Zeus
  Where to Debate Theists? Cephus 27 6792 April 13, 2017 at 8:51 pm
Last Post: Nanny
  Hitchens, Dawkins, Hawking, Ehrman, Coin, Sagan: Where are the Woman? Rhondazvous 44 5342 January 14, 2017 at 5:31 pm
Last Post: Mr Greene
  John Lennox and Richard Dawkins TheMonster 8 2514 October 14, 2016 at 5:51 pm
Last Post: TheMonster



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)