Oh dear, reading Rand? Better lay into some No-Doz and upgrade your BS detector ... she can be pretty sly.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 11, 2024, 11:49 pm
Thread Rating:
How Trump can win the election!
|
(August 20, 2016 at 1:15 am)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Oh dear, reading Rand? Better lay into some No-Doz and upgrade your BS detector ... she can be pretty sly. Yeah. Ayn Rand is crap.
I don't believe you. Get over it.
Reading her works (I avoided her fiction, only read her philosophy stuff) was useful to me. I did buy into it for a while, and so while I reject her basic premise regarding altruism, I do still think she has some good points. She fetishizes individual liberty far too much, in the sense that she seems to reject the idea of a social compact outside of the avoidance of violence.
The main benefit I got from her was not in economic philosophy, and in finding and strengthening the rational underpinnings for my atheism. Before I read her, my atheism was inchoate, unreasonable. After reading her, I found my rationality and pursued it. (Sagan and Randi also played major roles.) RE: How Trump can win the election!
August 20, 2016 at 2:05 am
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2016 at 2:06 am by Edwardo Piet.)
Rand sees everything in black and white. I looked into Objectivism a few years ago and quickly realized it's ridiculous.
(August 19, 2016 at 11:02 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Unless it's under oath, lying is not a crime, and certainly not a crime worthy of occupying a very expensive S-Max cell. Yes, perjury, which is lying under oath is a federal crime: http://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-cha...rjury.html And, there are SuperMax prisons that house non-violent offenders. RE: How Trump can win the election!
August 20, 2016 at 8:17 am
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2016 at 8:20 am by Jehanne.)
(August 20, 2016 at 12:15 am)Homeless Nutter Wrote:(August 19, 2016 at 10:55 pm)Jehanne Wrote: Bill Clinton, the President, was found by a federal judge to have lied under oath, which is a felony. I voted for Bill and could care less whose mouth his dick was, but yes, he did lie under oath about it; a federal judge ruled on that: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics...e-1.904790 P.S. Prisons are full of drug offenders mostly. (August 20, 2016 at 12:19 am)ScienceAf Wrote: Drumpf's losing... I am not voting for the asshole who is also a lying adulterous cheater. But, I am saying that climate change is Trump's last card, which, if he begins to play it correctly, might get the ball at least back on the court. (August 20, 2016 at 8:15 am)Jehanne Wrote:(August 19, 2016 at 11:02 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Unless it's under oath, lying is not a crime, and certainly not a crime worthy of occupying a very expensive S-Max cell. Hence my caveat, which was the very first sentence in my post. (August 20, 2016 at 8:15 am)Jehanne Wrote: And, there are SuperMax prisons that house non-violent offenders. I wasn't arguing that there are or aren't Supermax prisons for nonviolent criminals. I was saying that lying -- even under oath -- is not a crime worthy of such expensive punishment. That said, I'd like to see some support for this claim of yours. |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)