BTW, that's gang rape, not misdemeanor assault

[Shell B]

I was thinking about hacking your account in order to make you even gladder but it's not worthy to get my hands dirty with a filth like yourself.

You try anything of the sort and you will be immediately banned, not that I believe you could hack your way out of a cardboard box with a chainsaw.

Yes, there is no Polish race. That doesn't mean you get to be a cunt.

[abaris]

Additionally, another positive from the secrecy rules regarding the identities of minors, these boys will still be able to work at McDonalds !!!   YEA!

According to Pastor Manning this is business as usual at Starbucks.

[account_inactive]

I was thinking about hacking your account in order to make you even gladder but it's not worthy to get my hands dirty with a filth like yourself.

I needed that laugh.

[mlmooney89]

Only in America when it comes to western countries. America's legal system is archaic and purely punitive in nature. That's not the case in Western Europe. I would have gone to jail and probably would be on the sex offenders list if I had spent my teen years in the USA. For more than one reason, such as smoking dope or taking a piss in public or just being a disgusting pig serving someone adulterated food containing bodily fluids. Not a single one of the above incidences had any sexual connotation. But in the USA some of them would.

This isn't smoking pot or peeing in public (which btw people do ALL the time here) this is a whole different level. This isn't comparing apples to oranges this is comparing apples to.. watermelons. Not even on the same playing field even if you do keep saying they all belong in the same category.

You read all of what I said? Of what you quoted? If you had, you wouldn't say your piece on apples and oranges.

Yes I did. You listed the things you've done and said we would consider them sexual. But we weren't talking about any of those other things nor are they nearly as bad as what these children did, hence the apples to watermelons comment. You listed three things and said some of them would be sexual here. Well the pot one isn't, the peeing in public isn't (it's indecent exposure yes but we aren't claiming it is sexual it's only because it's not decent to pee in front of people), and putting bodily fluids on food... I'm assuming you mean spit or similar. No that's not sexual either. None of these are sexual until you get into the seamen part of this thread's subject. THAT is sexual. So I don't really get why you brought up other acts and tried to compare it to what happened. We get it, you aren't American whoop-de-do, if this had happened anywhere else it would still need to carry criminal charges.

[abaris]

None of these are sexual until you get into the seamen part of this thread's subject. THAT is sexual. So I don't really get why you brought up other acts and tried to compare it to what happened. We get it, you aren't American whoop-de-do, if this had happened anywhere else it would still need to carry criminal charges.

No, it wouldn't. There have been incidences, so there's precedence. The perps have been fined, as is usual with cases like that. It's considered a misdemeanor for a reason, but there are consequences. A few of them I have mentioned above. Such as suspension, if it happened in a school or dishonorable discharge if it happened in the army. Which it did, more than once.

Most things carrying extended sentences in the US end with a fine in Europe. Such as fucking in the streets or exposing yourself in public or taking a leak for that matter. Some things end with a fine or probation. Such as smoking and possessing without the intent to supply, or with the intent to supply but the quantity being minute.

And for the record, in our case it was injecting urine into fruits served to our teachers.

[Asmodee]

That is messed up, right there.  I don't know that I'd call it "rape", but I wouldn't balk at "sexual assault", which is often what rape is called anyway.  There are also laws in several states about purposely contaminating food, intended for the fast food and restaurant industries.  In this case, however, I would say that the "prank" definitely had strong sexual undertones.

EDIT: A quick search turned up other such incidents where the charge was something along the lines of "criminal sexual conduct".

[ErGingerbreadMandude]

Heh, yours is officially the worst place for boys to grow up if they are guaranteed to have their life ruined (that's 60+ years) over a stupid prank (that probably took 5 mins). Why can't the teacher just be an adult and prank them back? That way everyone's happy

20 bucks says that teacher is determined to make sure to ruin the kids reputation so bad they never make another dime in their lives. Fantastic

[The Grand Nudger]

• I don't think the teacher is ruining anybodies rep, they did that all by themselves.  

[vorlon13]

And the charges are already down to misdemeanor disturbing the peace.

You'd potentially be in more trouble failing to stop at a stop sign.

[Little lunch]

I heard that the Polish are the best race at hacking in the world.