Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
(September 7, 2017 at 8:40 pm)Godscreated Wrote: Until someone can show that one certain animal became something else evolution has no leg to stand on.
Only religious people say that's what evolution is. Scientists don't. You're not going to convince anyone if you rely on strawman arguments.
(September 7, 2017 at 8:40 pm)Godscreated Wrote: How many times do we have to say that information can not be added to DNA.
Yeah but each time you say it, you're wrong. Mutations add information. If they didn't do this then my genetic algorithms would not be as useful.
(September 7, 2017 at 8:40 pm)Godscreated Wrote: It really strikes me funny when evolutionist believe the chicken in the back yard was once a meat eating dino.
It really strikes me funny that theists believe that Jesus was an alien with tentacles that sucked out the brains of Roman soldiers. See how strawman arguments are a waste of time? Birds descended from dinosaurs. Chickens were never dinosaurs, otherwise they would be dinosaurs, not chickens.
Maybe you should learn what evolution is before arguing against it,
Godscreated Wrote:Until someone can show that one certain animal became something else evolution has no leg to stand on.
GC, your understanding of evolution is so poor that you cite something that would disprove evolution if it happened as what it would take for you to believe evolution is true.
One more time. No organism becomes another organism. No organism spawns another organism that isn't the same species as the parent organism, or a hybrid if the parents are different species. But the offspring are not exactly like the parents, each one is a little different due to genetic mixing and mutations. These variations are inheritable. If a variation favorably affects an organism's chance of reproducing, that variation will become more common. If a variation unfavorably affects an organism's chance of reproducing, that variation will become less common. Over hundreds or thousands of generations, an organism's descendants can come to be quite different from their ancestors if the reproductive success environment changes, or remain much the same if the reproductive success environment remains much the same. But even then, though the descendants superficially remain similar, after enough generations genetic drift will have made the descendants so genetically dissimilar that they would not be able to successfully interbreed with one of their remote ancestors. This kind of change (genetic drift) is almost impossible to detect in the fossil record, but genes tell the story.
Another story genes tell is of endogenous retroviruses. This is when a virus's DNA is incorporated into the germ line of the host species, which mean that until the forces of selection and drift eliminate it or sufficiently alter it, it acts as a foolproof marker of lines of descent. There's literally no other reasonable explanation for two organisms to have the same viral DNA in the same location unless they are in the same line of descent. This is the genetic smoking gun for evolution. Retroviral DNA provides markers that allow us to measure the degree of relationship between species based on how many of these markers they have in common. The more markers in common, the closer the relationship. You will have many of the same retroviral markers as your parents, for instance. Endogenous retroviruses comprise around 5% of the human genome. We have more of these 'viral fossils' in common with chimpanzees than gorillas, indicating a more recent common ancestor. Again, there is literally no other reason than common descent for us to have the same retroviral insertions in the same places as apes do (and fewer with monkeys, and fewer with lemurs, and so forth).
Before you decide what it would take to convince you that the modern synthesis is the most likely available scientific explanation for the development and diversity of life, you should understand what it is actually saying. Any 'evolution tree' you've seen is necessarily grossly oversimplified, leaving out thousands of gradual intermediate steps, separations and re-joinings, and countless 'branches and twigs'.
If you showed the Bible the same level of skepticism you direct at biology, you'd not only be an atheist, you'd be the 'the Bible is all fake' kind.
(September 7, 2017 at 8:40 pm)Godscreated Wrote: To the rest of you,I've said what I know and will not discuss this with you, to many post that would get us nowhere, you have your beliefs and I have mine, 'nough said.
GC
Yes, you're right; what you've said is unconvincing, and you don't understand what the facts say about the world because you lack the education to put them together and draw an appropriate conclusion. Plugging your ears and shouting "lalalalalalalala" is probably the only option left to you.
Quiz for Students in Kansas Public Schools
by Lloyd Fricker
from BioMedNet
The recent decision by the Kansas Board of Education to ban the teaching of evolution and anything else that disagrees with creationist views has left many people wondering, What will they teach in science classes? It's also left a few people wondering, Was this group the Board of Education or the Bored of Education? Well, we've obtained an authentic copy of a science test to be given to ninth graders in Kansas. As you can see from the following test, they do mention evolution and natural selection. Answers are given at the end.
Quiz for Students in Kansas Public Schools
1. How much time did it take for the creation of the universe and all the plants and animals?
10.Write a 2 page essay on "How we know the Earth is flat." See answer
Answers:
1. (a) It took 5 days for the creation of the universe and all the plants and animals. If you answered "b" (6 days), you were probably thinking of the time it took to create the universe, the plants, the animals, and the people.
See question
2. (a) All heavenly bodies revolve around the Earth. If you answered Kansas, you were partially right since Kansas is the center of the Earth.
See question
4. (d) Charles Darwin was a bad person because of many things. He was basically a rotten evil person.
See question
5. (d) Natural selection is the term used when someone chooses a herbal medicine over a drug made by Satan-worshipping scientists.
See question
6. (d) The problem with the theory of evolution is all of the above: it contradicts eyewitness reports of God, who was the only one present at the time of creation. It also takes too long and doesn't explain why there would be good and evil.
See question
7. (a) The Big Bang is another term for a Fourth of July party. If you answered "c," we will notify your parents.
See question
9. (d) People who don't believe in the Bible's description of Creation are called many bad names including heathen scum, the devil's helpers, and scientists. These names all mean the same thing.
See question
10. The answers will vary for this essay question on "how we know the Earth is flat", but all should include the following points:
See question
Quote:To the rest of you, I've said what I know and will not discuss this with you, to many post that would get us nowhere, you have your beliefs and I have mine, 'nough said.
Nope we have our facts ,evidence and reason
You have your bullshit your pretend is on par
There is no similarity or equality to be found
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
(September 8, 2017 at 2:06 pm)drfuzzy Wrote: Quiz for Students in Kansas Public Schools
by Lloyd Fricker
from BioMedNet
The recent decision by the Kansas Board of Education to ban the teaching of evolution and anything else that disagrees with creationist views has left many people wondering, What will they teach in science classes? It's also left a few people wondering, Was this group the Board of Education or the Bored of Education? Well, we've obtained an authentic copy of a science test to be given to ninth graders in Kansas. As you can see from the following test, they do mention evolution and natural selection. Answers are given at the end.
Quiz for Students in Kansas Public Schools
1. How much time did it take for the creation of the universe and all the plants and animals?
10.Write a 2 page essay on "How we know the Earth is flat." See answer
Answers:
1. (a) It took 5 days for the creation of the universe and all the plants and animals. If you answered "b" (6 days), you were probably thinking of the time it took to create the universe, the plants, the animals, and the people.
See question
2. (a) All heavenly bodies revolve around the Earth. If you answered Kansas, you were partially right since Kansas is the center of the Earth.
See question
4. (d) Charles Darwin was a bad person because of many things. He was basically a rotten evil person.
See question
5. (d) Natural selection is the term used when someone chooses a herbal medicine over a drug made by Satan-worshipping scientists.
See question
6. (d) The problem with the theory of evolution is all of the above: it contradicts eyewitness reports of God, who was the only one present at the time of creation. It also takes too long and doesn't explain why there would be good and evil.
See question
7. (a) The Big Bang is another term for a Fourth of July party. If you answered "c," we will notify your parents.
See question
9. (d) People who don't believe in the Bible's description of Creation are called many bad names including heathen scum, the devil's helpers, and scientists. These names all mean the same thing.
See question
10. The answers will vary for this essay question on "how we know the Earth is flat", but all should include the following points:
See question