Who Says

[Ravenshire]

I know this is wasted effort considering the willful ignorance of this one, but...

Sorry GC, but your lies and your willful ignorance make you a completely unreliable source. It's painfully obvious you've never so much as cracked a science book, let alone a text on evolution. You can claim they're wrong all you like, but the evidence is in and until you can provide a better explanation (no, gawd isn't an explanation, it's a cop-out) for the evidence, you only continue to look the fool.

You are walking, talking proof that religion is simplification for the hard-at-thinking.

How is it you can even make such a statement, we haven't even discussed evolution and I like how you want to eliminate any response by throwing out the only other alternative, weak and childish.

Childish? Nah, that would be plugging you ears and yelling "La-la-la-la-la-la-la I can't hear you" as you do every fucking time the subject of evolution comes up. You and I may have never discussed evolution, but your wilful ignorance has been on display around here for a long time. You claim to have studied it, yet keep repeating the same ID bullshit. Crack a real textbook for a change.

Until someone can show that one certain animal became something else evolution has no leg to stand on.

It's been done. In laboratories with fruit flies and with bacteria You know, things with life spans short enough that we can observe how it works and even repeat the same experiments.

How many times do we have to say that information can not be added to DNA.

As many as you'd like. Your ID bullshit won't gain any more traction from repetition though. It's gonna remain bullshit.

Hey even one plant into another. It really strikes me funny when evolutionist believe the chicken in the back yard was once a meat eating dino.

And here you misrepresent scientific claims, and spew an argument from incredulity. Scientist claim that the evolution from dinosaurs to birds is the most likely explanation, based on the evidence. Not that "the chicken in the back yard was once a meat eating dino." Do you even realize how ignorant you make yourself sound when you spout shit like that?

If you are made about the money thing, you need to understand how science works from the inside. When a scientist wants funding to study the eating habits of a certain animal it's not going to happen but, if the phrase global warming is put into the request the funding will come through, this from a scientist whom I can't recall his name.

I know how science works, from the inside. It has nothing to do with money. That would be the funding, from outside sources. Funding for science and the internal workings of science have little to do with one another.

No surprise you "can't remember" the scientists name. He's likely either a figure of your imagination or someone who's already been debunked by everyone with a couple functioning synapses.

Believe what you want and you will because you will never look at the negative side of evolutionary science, if evolution was to go down there would be so many people out of work it wouldn't be funny, that's why the major players are working so hard behind the scene to keep it going. Money, money, money.

GC

I'll continue to trust the educated over the uneducated and until and unless a better theory displaces evolution, that's where we're at, despite your imagined negative side. I don't think many people will be out of work if evolution were to be over set though. See, that's the great thing about science. When it reaches a dead end, or a theory doesn't pan out, science (unlike your mythology) is self correcting. All those people you gleefully foresee as being out of work would simply shift to the new paradigm.

Tell you what, genius. You provide a theory which fits the evidence better, without resorting to magic spell casting by your personal sky-wizard, and you'll win a fucking Nobel Prize. Or, you can keep wallowing in your wilful ignorance and keep insisting that gawd poofed it all into existence with magic words, and you'll continue to be mocked and ridiculed.

[Athene]

Aisle tell you what....non-believers are sick and tired of your cereal accusations. I understand that the pear of you have views that differ grately, but you had no right to talk to him that whey! It's about thyme you got act together, GC. 

If not, you can continue to expect chili receptions on this forum!

 Okay I was in a hurry and used the wrong word, is that something to get so upset over, I mean geeeeez! I can't see where I said anything to him nearly as bad as has been said to me, if people can't take the heat get out of the kitchen. There will never be a day I respond to someone worse than they do to me, you of all the people here should know that and I'm disappointed in your response.

GC

Relax GC, don't be mad. I was just joking around. Even you have to admit the meat thing was pretty funny.

You've gotta be able to laugh at yourself sometimes, man.

[The Grand Nudger]

Ah, but then he'd be mocking the only god he knew.  

[Amarok]

How is it you can even make such a statement, we haven't even discussed evolution and I like how you want to eliminate any response by throwing out the only other alternative, weak and childish.

There is no alternative . Just a lot of crap pretending that is

Until someone can show that one certain animal became something else evolution has no leg to stand on.

Not needed .And every step that we need to show has been shown. Creationists to date have given no proof "kinds" exist or that DNA has modifying limits that disallow it .

How many times do we have to say that information can not be added to DNA.

You can say it all day long . It's still wrong.

Hey even one plant into another. It really strikes me funny when evolutionist believe the chicken in the back yard was once a meat eating dino.

It's not all funny that scientists (accept )that chickens(A bird that does eat meat) are related via common decent to a Dinosuar that ate meat.

If you are made about the money thing, you need to understand how science works from the inside.

Which you clearly don't

When a scientist wants funding to study the eating habits of a certain animal it's not going to happen but, if the phrase global warming is put into the request the funding will come through, this from a scientist whom I can't recall his name.

That's not how grants work . So your scientist is a liar or not a scientist

Believe what you want and you will because you will never look at the negative side of evolutionary

I have read creationist and IDiot nonsense since the 1970s. You fuck wit have not changed your shit or advanced anything that has not been torn to shreds. And evolution is a fact not a belief .

, if evolution was to go down there would be so many people out of work it wouldn't be funny

No they would shift to the new paradigm and nothing will have changed .

that's why the major players are working so hard behind the scene to keep it going. Money, money, money.

Could you name these shadowy figures oh wait they don't exist  . And this is rich coming from creationism a group that has made millions selling crap .

[Pat Mustard]

To the rest of you, I've said what I know and will not discuss this with you, to many post that would get us nowhere, you have your beliefs and I have mine, 'nough said.

GC

Trouble for you, Mr I'll change my name in a pathetic attempt to give my long debunked arguments new life, is that what you "know" consists solely of PRATTs and cannot stand up to the vast masses of evidence in favour of evolution (up to and including observational data of species evolving in the wild).

[downbeatplumb]

Who says God doesn't _____________ us His creation to speak to us.

GC

I'd like to buy a verb, I think.  

Good to see you putting so much care into your posts.




No really, WTH were you trying to say.  (Were you doing drugs?)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ICsRvUG2j8Q

[Joods]

Okay, okay I wanted to see some reaction and got it, but I'm surprised no one noticed my avatar, it was all in fun.

GC

Well in order for it to be funny, a few things have to happen:
1 - You have to be funny.
2 - Spelling checking is important.
3 - people here have to actually like you.

None of the above apply in your situation.

[Cyberman]

To the rest of you, I've said what I know and will not discuss this with you, to many post that would get us nowhere, you have your beliefs and I have mine, 'nough said.

A very laudable and honest position to take on a discussion forum.

[Harry Nevis]

  How is it you can even make such a statement, we haven't even discussed evolution and I like how you want to eliminate any response by throwing out the only other alternative, weak and childish. Until someone can show that one certain animal became something else evolution has no leg to stand on. How many times do we have to say that information can not be added to DNA. Hey even one plant into another. It really strikes me funny when evolutionist believe the chicken in the back yard was once a meat eating dino. If you are made about the money thing, you need to understand how science works from the inside. When a scientist wants funding to study the eating habits of a certain animal it's not going to happen but, if the phrase global warming is put into the request the funding will come through, this from a scientist whom I can't recall his name. Believe what you want and you will because you will never look at the negative side of evolutionary science, if evolution was to go down there would be so many people out of work it wouldn't be funny, that's why the major players are working so hard behind the scene to keep it going. Money, money, money. 

GC

---

This post really highlights your close-minded stupidity. But, then again, most of your posts do. It's obvious you've never cracked a science book from this little diatribe and know nothing of what you talk about.

[Neo-Scholastic]

So many atheists, so little time to troll (sigh)