Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 25, 2024, 2:58 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
(October 27, 2017 at 8:42 am)SteveII Wrote:
(October 25, 2017 at 4:38 pm)Mathilda Wrote: The theory of evolution is testable. It has been tested and found to be correct.

Regardless as to your position on evolution, this statement just isn't true unless you equivocate on the definition of 'evolution'. The word can be used in three senses: 

1. Evolution (defined as "decent with modification") 
2. Evolution (defined as "the mechanism that accounts for evolutionary change") 
3. Evolution (defined as "reconstructing evolutionary history") 

The second and third definitions are not testable and there are significant gaps in our knowledge about them. You think they are correct because #1 is correct and then through inferred by a naturalistic worldview, the other two must be correct--but that is a far cry from fact

It's the best explanation we have right now. If a better one comes along we'll put this in the box with phlogiston.
Reply
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
(October 26, 2017 at 7:06 pm)Godscreated Wrote:
(October 25, 2017 at 4:18 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote: I argue GC comes across as a total, complete and perfect moron.
Possible a poe.

 Frankly the discussions I have with others are none of your business, don't be like others answer what I post to you.

GC

(October 25, 2017 at 4:38 pm)Mathilda Wrote: The theory of evolution is testable. It has been tested and found to be correct.

Also, mutations increase the information content.

 No it's not you've been fooled and/or brainwashed into think it can be tested and it's only a theory.

 Mutations are a loss of information not a gain, the loss comes from what is already there and it's actually not loss, it's replaced by something else already there. No new info at all, period.

GC

(October 25, 2017 at 9:52 pm)Jörmungandr Wrote: You're simply altering the hypothetical in order to avoid the conclusion.  Do you deny that information in the genome can be lost due to mutation?  In no clear sense does the term recessive apply.  Recessive traits can express themselves without a change in the DNA.  This is not at all analogous to the hypothetical given.  The hypothetical given was an example where the information was actually lost.  You're simply choosing not to answer the hypothetical.

To answer the hypothetical then C could never be.

GC
I'd love to reply to you given you could ever string together a coherent sentence or question.

I'll pray you gain the ability.
RAmen
"For the only way to eternal glory is a life lived in service of our Lord, FSM; Verily it is FSM who is the perfect being the name higher than all names, king of all kings and will bestow upon us all, one day, The great reclaiming"  -The Prophet Boiardi-

      Conservative trigger warning.
[Image: s-l640.jpg]
                                                                                         
Reply
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
(October 27, 2017 at 8:42 am)SteveII Wrote:
(October 25, 2017 at 4:38 pm)Mathilda Wrote: The theory of evolution is testable. It has been tested and found to be correct.

Regardless as to your position on evolution, this statement just isn't true unless you equivocate on the definition of 'evolution'. The word can be used in three senses: 

1. Evolution (defined as "decent with modification") 
2. Evolution (defined as "the mechanism that accounts for evolutionary change") 
3. Evolution (defined as "reconstructing evolutionary history") 

The second and third definitions are not testable and there are significant gaps in our knowledge about them. You think they are correct because #1 is correct and then through inferred by a naturalistic worldview, the other two must be correct--but that is a far cry from fact

All 3 are well understood:

https://www.nap.edu/catalog/6024/science...academy-of
Reply
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
We should have a list, "The 73 stages of Evolution Denial".
Reply
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
I would like Steve, et. al., to tell us how old they think the Earth & Universe to be.  If they say that they don't know or give a Biblical value, then I think that they need to consult a quality mental health professional in addition to a quality science textbook.
Reply
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
(October 27, 2017 at 1:21 pm)Jehanne Wrote:
(October 27, 2017 at 8:42 am)SteveII Wrote: Regardless as to your position on evolution, this statement just isn't true unless you equivocate on the definition of 'evolution'. The word can be used in three senses: 

1. Evolution (defined as "decent with modification") 
2. Evolution (defined as "the mechanism that accounts for evolutionary change") 
3. Evolution (defined as "reconstructing evolutionary history") 

The second and third definitions are not testable and there are significant gaps in our knowledge about them. You think they are correct because #1 is correct and then through inferred by a naturalistic worldview, the other two must be correct--but that is a far cry from fact

All 3 are well understood:

https://www.nap.edu/catalog/6024/science...academy-of

That's funny, because from your own link, the very first sentence starts with..."While the mechanisms of evolution are still under investigation..." Why do you think they start the entire description of their paper off with that phrase? It's not even like it was buried on page 47, it's the very first sentence.

The mechanism is not understood. While there are some theories on how portions of it might work, both it and evolutionary history is inferred by #1 being a testable/observable fact coupled to an assumption of naturalism.

(October 27, 2017 at 1:39 pm)Jehanne Wrote: I would like Steve, et. al., to tell us how old they think the Earth & Universe to be.  If they say that they don't know or give a Biblical value, then I think that they need to consult a quality mental health professional in addition to a quality science textbook.

I think it is what it appears to be:

Universe: 13+ billion years old
Earth: 4+ billion years old

I am open to where the science leads us.
Reply
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
Steve, science is the study of the natural. Of course there's an assumption of naturalism.

I mean, c'mon, you're not even trying at this point.
Reply
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
(October 27, 2017 at 2:55 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Steve, science is the study of the natural.  Of course there's an assumption of naturalism.

I mean, c'mon, you're not even trying at this point.

That wasn't my point. I was giving the reason why #2 and #3 are inferred. An inference fueled by an observable fact and a philosophical worldview does not a fact make. 

I have no problem with methodological naturalism and the related principles as part of a philosophy of science. But we need to be more precise when we throw around the word 'fact' and ridicule people who object.
Reply
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
No, "we" don't.  You believe in fairies and object to facts because you believe in fairies.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
RE: For Christians (or anyone else) who deny Darwinian evolution.
(October 27, 2017 at 3:10 pm)Khemikal Wrote: No, "we" don't.  You believe in fairies and object to facts because you believe in fairies.

Your desire (or ability?) not to be precise is noted. As a point of 'fact', I don't believe in fairies so your conclusion is nonsense--but thanks to the imprecise example!
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [Serious] Do we have any female Christians left? If not, anyone is welcome to comment. Losty 34 4310 May 13, 2019 at 12:20 pm
Last Post: WolfsChild
  Christians vs Christians (yec) Fake Messiah 52 10261 January 31, 2019 at 2:08 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Two audio books for Christians (and, everyone else) Jehanne 3 701 January 16, 2019 at 12:52 am
Last Post: Fake Messiah
  Does everyone else feel dizzy from the lights in Church? Der/die AtheistIn 15 2797 December 11, 2017 at 6:34 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Any one else watch The Last Days of Jesus on PBS ? vorlon13 9 2884 April 16, 2017 at 12:24 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Why do Christians become Christians? SteveII 168 36985 May 20, 2016 at 8:43 pm
Last Post: drfuzzy
  Christians. Prove That You Are Real/True Christians Nope 155 57047 September 1, 2015 at 1:26 pm
Last Post: Pyrrho
  The first Christians weren't Bible Christians Phatt Matt s 60 17649 March 26, 2014 at 10:26 am
Last Post: rightcoaster
  Why Christians Attack Evolution Michael Schubert 318 41457 March 21, 2014 at 7:09 pm
Last Post: fr0d0
  Looking for Something Else and Stumbled Across This. Minimalist 2 1166 July 4, 2013 at 8:05 pm
Last Post: pineapplebunnybounce



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)