Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
(November 10, 2017 at 6:46 am)Mathilda Wrote: It's not so much that theists don't feel so responsible for their actions in that they are giving up responsibility for their actions to someone else.
They are partially outsourcing their decision making process by deliberately going to a service every Sunday to be preached to. And it's not just an hour or so of praise about how wonderful their god is, but preaching about what people should value (e.g. family values), about how to live their lives, about what people should hate (e.g. homosexuality, pornography, masturbation etc)
All people partially outsource their decision making process by seeking advice.
Again, if atheists are all figuring out these gray issues for themselves, why do they seem to mostly have the same beliefs on any given issue?
Yes, there are some atheists here who are against abortion. Similarly, their are some Christian churches that accept openly LGBT members.
What's the difference? Why is it acceptable to partially outsource to atheist youtube videos, but not to a church?
(November 9, 2017 at 6:11 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: So, you're trying to somehow turn actual mental illness
And other things like bad relationships and divorce, alcohol and drug abuse, porn and masturbation instead of real relationships, etc.
Also, I don't subscribe to the notion that mental illness is always random. I've suffered from depression, and it was likely caused by poor life choices I made.
Quote:into a tu quoque towards people who are insulting towards your religion?
Into a counter example to someone who says that religion stunts mental growth.
I suffer from depression too so?
Do you assign your malady to the Satan Muslims claim screwing with your neurons causing your depression? No? GREAT, neither do I.
I don't see any cosmic battle between a super hero vs a super villain causing my depression. I simply see that as a natural event due to genes and environmental input.
I also don't assign my depression to Lex Luther or Darth Vader either. But please don't sit there and try to claim only theists know what it is like to go through hard things.
(November 10, 2017 at 9:02 am)Aegon Wrote: I got to say I'm cringing/laughing at everybody describing their personal lives trying to prove themselves to a complete stranger.
What would you think about someone engaging in voyeurism on such discussion?
(November 10, 2017 at 6:46 am)Mathilda Wrote: It's not so much that theists don't feel so responsible for their actions in that they are giving up responsibility for their actions to someone else.
They are partially outsourcing their decision making process by deliberately going to a service every Sunday to be preached to. And it's not just an hour or so of praise about how wonderful their god is, but preaching about what people should value (e.g. family values), about how to live their lives, about what people should hate (e.g. homosexuality, pornography, masturbation etc)
All people partially outsource their decision making process by seeking advice.
Again, if atheists are all figuring out these gray issues for themselves, why do they seem to mostly have the same beliefs on any given issue?
Yes, there are some atheists here who are against abortion. Similarly, their are some Christian churches that accept openly LGBT members.
What's the difference? Why is it acceptable to partially outsource to atheist youtube videos, but not to a church?
Nobody here is claiming all atheists agree 100% of the time. We most certainly are just as diverse in our opinions as theists, I don't think any atheist here is denying that.
But what does that have to do with god claims or old mythology?
There are atheists who are against abortion? Yea and?
There are also atheists who worship firearms on par of right wing theists too.
There are atheists who think Che who lead to Castro's Cuba was a good thing.
There are atheists who like Ayn Rand like Catholic Paul Ryan does.
So?
I don't agree with anyone who holds those positions, regardless if they believe or not.
Bringing this up like you did in this post is not an argument for your position. Yea we don't always agree so? That only proves we don't always agree, that is not a an argument for your club or God.
(November 10, 2017 at 8:57 am)alpha male Wrote: And other things like bad relationships and divorce, alcohol and drug abuse, porn and masturbation instead of real relationships, etc.
Also, I don't subscribe to the notion that mental illness is always random. I've suffered from depression, and it was likely caused by poor life choices I made.
Into a counter example to someone who says that religion stunts mental growth.
I suffer from depression too so?
Do you assign your malady to the Satan Muslims claim screwing with your neurons causing your depression? No? GREAT, neither do I.
I don't see any cosmic battle between a super hero vs a super villain causing my depression. I simply see that as a natural event due to genes and environmental input.
I also don't assign my depression to Lex Luther or Darth Vader either. But please don't sit there and try to claim only theists know what it is like to go through hard things.
Did you even read the post? It answered your question. When I did things generally considered to be sinful, I ended up depressed. When I changed from those behaviors, the depression cleared up. When I see myself slipping into certain behaviors, I can now see depression returning, and I change the behavior.
I agree that mental illness is a result of genes and environmental input. I'm simply noting that my own choices play a big role in my environment. That should be common sense.
While there are instances of mental illness which are purely or mostly due to genetics or environmental effects completely outside one's control, personal choices frequently play a significant role.
Consider OP - she says that when an adult converts to religion (i.e. a change in environment resulting from a personal choice), their mental faculties decline. And she says they deserve contempt for making that choice.
That gets kudos. When I hold up a mirror, I'm the bad guy.
(November 9, 2017 at 8:20 pm)Nay_Sayer Wrote: I'll help you both; When you see a topic that makes you feel uncomfortable because it asks questions you've refused to ever ask yourself that isn't provocation, It's discussion.
If you see a thread and the beginning line is something like "I think we can all agree Christians are all just morons" that is, in fact, provocation.
I hope this has been informative and I return you to your regularly scheduled martyrdom.
The OP was not intended to be insulting but I knew that many people would find it so. But it is something that I truly feel the more I think about religion and see just how fantastical and out of touch with reality it is. And I do think that it needs to be said. It's a case of the Emperor's new clothes. No one wants to make everyone embarrassed but after a while it gets too frustrating not to call out the horse shit for what it is. I did not mention the subject of an imaginary friend but I am glad that people did bring it up.
My thoughts first turned along these lines when I saw this picture
It's not odd to think of children praying to an imaginary friend, but then you see the parents holding hands and praying and then the grandparents and my thoughts are, just grow up. Do they really think that their thought waves are emanating out of their heads like a wi-fi signal to be sent to a god who is reading each message? Or when I see a picture of my brother on Facebook laying hands on someone to faith heal them as if he has magical powers. Does he really think that he is channeling some magical power that can sense what is wrong and rearrange the atoms in the receiving body according to some unknown template? Answer: yes. And I've seen him become more and more immersed in the fantasy over the years since he converted.
I do get why people are insulted though. They'll know that they don't act childishly and they'll miss my point about religious indoctrination arresting personal development. To explain what I mean, compare how children solve problems. Something is bad so ban it. This is binary thinking and the religiously inclined do tend to suffer from binary religious thinking. But then you tell the child about why we can't ban the use of something like oil, because we need it to power our cars and produce plastic and they're at a loss and expect the adult to give them the answer. Much like the religiously indoctrinated want the answers given to them in a book or sermon without question.
Now compare this thinking to how people grow more aware about all the different issues the more worldly they become, how they can feel able to give more leeway to someone who they recognise as behaving badly because they are deeply troubled for example. In the same way, you never feel more clever or enlightened as you learn more about the world because it seems obvious once things are pointed out to you. instead, you just start to wonder why other people don't see it as well. Organised religion deliberately slows down this process.
Being childish isn't a problem. I suspect that we maintain the desire to play as adults so we play with our children and help them learn and to expand their mental capabilities. I've started playing Dungeons & Dragons myself and am having a real good time doing it. But the difference is that I don't think D&D is real. No matter how hard I try I know that I will never be able to summon up a magic missile in real life. Yet I have in the past read many occult books from people who think that they do practise magic, or out of body experiences. Praying and attempts at faith healing are exactly the same thing. It's giving yourself the illusion of control over your environment rather than actually facing up to the real world.
A lot of this, seems like you are arguing about a caricature from my point of view (doesn't match up with me). In the OP, you seemed very focused on morals; and I may try to get back to that later. However much of this post, seems dependent on your unbelief and the belief of others not being true of reality. That if it where true, your logic would not follow. Do you think that it would be equally valid, for others to who have dissimilar views from yourself to call you childish?
It is said that an argument is what convinces reasonable men and a proof is what it takes to convince even an unreasonable man. - Alexander Vilenkin If I am shown my error, I will be the first to throw my books into the fire. - Martin Luther
(November 10, 2017 at 9:20 am)Brian37 Wrote: Nobody here is claiming all atheists agree 100% of the time. We most certainly are just as diverse in our opinions as theists, I don't think any atheist here is denying that.
The point isn't the degree of diversity, which is low. The point is the high degree of agreement among atheists. It suggests that they're getting their moral judgments in part from shared outside sources, just as OP accuses theists of doing. They just go to different sources.
November 10, 2017 at 9:32 am (This post was last modified: November 10, 2017 at 9:33 am by Whateverist.)
(November 10, 2017 at 9:26 am)alpha male Wrote:
(November 10, 2017 at 9:20 am)Brian37 Wrote: Nobody here is claiming all atheists agree 100% of the time. We most certainly are just as diverse in our opinions as theists, I don't think any atheist here is denying that.
The point isn't the degree of diversity, which is low. The point is the high degree of agreement among atheists. It suggests that they're getting their moral judgments in part from shared outside sources, just as OP accuses theists of doing. They just go to different sources.
Especially if you ask the right question, like: believe in any gods?