DNA Proves Existence of a Designer

[pocaracas]

Still no answer to any of these questions. (x2)
It is telling that you cower away from sharing your thought process... if there is any...

It is outside the topic of the OP which states DNA proves design.

We don't care. The mods allow it.
Please, indulge us.

[The Grand Nudger]

You are a sad people on this site.

Not as sad as someone who loudly proclaims that he can't possibly be wrong and anyone who disagrees with him shouldn't be working in the field of DNA research, which is close to 100% of people actually researching the nature of DNA. It's a good thing molecular biologists have mechanical engineers to 'ID-splain' their own work to them.

LOL, don;t besmirch the honorable name of mechanical engineering.  Those engineers are minority loons in their own right. 

It wouldn;t be possible for a person to understand system design at a professional level without simultaneously being aware of why the ID argument is fundamentally flawed. They may still believe in ID, sure......but they know the shortcomings of the position from an evidentiary standpoint, as do the proponents of id. This much has been attested to -by- those proponents under oath and in the public record.

[pocaracas]

Not as sad as someone who loudly proclaims that he can't possibly be wrong and anyone who disagrees with him shouldn't be working in the field of DNA research, which is close to 100% of people actually researching the nature of DNA. It's a good thing molecular biologists have mechanical engineers to 'ID-splain' their own work to them.

LOL, don;t besmirch the honorable name of mechanical engineering.  Those engineers are minority loons in their own right. 

I knew I'd gotten the wrong degree... .Physics engineering.... who the hell wants that?! Mechanical engineering is where it's at!

[CDF47]

You are a sad people on this site.

Not as sad as someone who loudly proclaims that he can't possibly be wrong and anyone who disagrees with him shouldn't be working in the field of DNA research, which is close to 100% of people actually researching the nature of DNA. It's a good thing molecular biologists have mechanical engineers to 'ID-splain' their own work to them.

The study of ID requires a multi-disciplinary team including bio-chemists, cosmologists, engineers,....

[The Grand Nudger]

No it doesn;t. All you need is magic book.

[CDF47]

No it doesn;t.  All you need is magic book.

ID and theology are separate topics although ID has religious implications as I have stated prior.

[Mister Agenda]

Not as sad as someone who loudly proclaims that he can't possibly be wrong and anyone who disagrees with him shouldn't be working in the field of DNA research, which is close to 100% of people actually researching the nature of DNA. It's a good thing molecular biologists have mechanical engineers to 'ID-splain' their own work to them.

LOL, don;t besmirch the honorable name of mechanical engineering.  Those engineers are minority loons in their own right. 

It wouldn;t be possible for a person to understand system design at a professional level without simultaneously being aware of why the ID argument is fundamentally flawed.  They may still believe in ID, sure......but they know the shortcomings of the position from an evidentiary standpoint, as do the proponents of id.  This much has been attested to -by- those proponents under oath and in the public record.

I agree, most engineers are quite creditable, but it's hard not to notice how many appear on lists of 'scientists who disagree with evolution' or some such. I imagine even most engineers who are creationists aren't arrogant enough to think they know molecular biology better than molecular biologists, though.

[CDF47]

LOL, don;t besmirch the honorable name of mechanical engineering.  Those engineers are minority loons in their own right. 

It wouldn;t be possible for a person to understand system design at a professional level without simultaneously being aware of why the ID argument is fundamentally flawed.  They may still believe in ID, sure......but they know the shortcomings of the position from an evidentiary standpoint, as do the proponents of id.  This much has been attested to -by- those proponents under oath and in the public record.

I agree, most engineers are quite creditable, but it's hard not to notice how many appear on lists of 'scientists who disagree with evolution' or some such. I imagine even most engineers who are creationists aren't arrogant enough to think they know molecular biology better than molecular biologists, though.

I know design better is all I am saying.

[Mister Agenda]

Not as sad as someone who loudly proclaims that he can't possibly be wrong and anyone who disagrees with him shouldn't be working in the field of DNA research, which is close to 100% of people actually researching the nature of DNA. It's a good thing molecular biologists have mechanical engineers to 'ID-splain' their own work to them.

The study of ID requires a multi-disciplinary team including bio-chemists, cosmologists, engineers,....

Qualifications don't matter when the object of investigation is imaginary.

---

I know design better is all I am saying.

They know biology, organic chemistry, and DNA better is all I am saying.

[The Grand Nudger]

 I said the entire universe is designed which is why even a dumb rock requires design

---

A rock does not show specified complexity so it is not designed 

Which one of these two assholes is right?

I know design better is all I am saying.

Do you, though?

---

No it doesn;t.  All you need is magic book.

ID and theology are separate topics although ID has religious implications as I have stated prior.

No, they're not.