Posts: 48
Threads: 0
Joined: June 17, 2018
Reputation:
1
RE: assisted suicide vs suicide prevention
June 18, 2018 at 7:04 am
(This post was last modified: June 18, 2018 at 7:22 am by MasterX.)
(June 17, 2018 at 2:47 pm)vulcanlogician Wrote: (June 17, 2018 at 2:42 pm)MasterX Wrote: It can't be more clear than that. If you condone suicide of those you know, you're culpable.
So, I think you are saying:
1) Suicide is morally wrong.
2) Anyone who says "suicide is okay" to someone contemplating it is also morally wrong.
I disagree with both. A person has a right (and, let's be frank, the privilege) to take their own life if they so choose. If someone else with whom they are associated with agrees with this decision, that is also their right. I fail to see where crime and culpability enter into it.
EDIT: Oh, and welcome to the forums
1) I think suicide is wrong morally, it's a selfish act that hurts people around you, which is not a moral thing to do, neither is it moral to take your life while not terminally ill or something similar.
2) But you just said below you don't consider suicide wrong so this is kind of self-refuting here to say that you don't think it's moral to tell them suicide is okay...
They have the right, doesn't mean it was right to do or told it's a privilege. The people around them friends/family who knew before hand that did nothing I feel hold some responsibility, but ultimately it's on the person who did it. I'm not saying condoning this is an actual legal crime, but to me it's immoral to do nothing, if that makes sense. An extreme example is if you tell someone to kill themselves online, you can be charged with a crime if they do it.
Also thanks for the welcome, good to meet ya.
(June 17, 2018 at 4:25 pm)The Valkyrie Wrote: (June 17, 2018 at 2:32 pm)MasterX Wrote: Condoning suicide is complicity in the crime.
No.
Complicity with a little c.
Not that they actually hold equal share or that condoning it is an actual crime. Just to clarify.
Posts: 5813
Threads: 86
Joined: November 19, 2017
Reputation:
59
RE: assisted suicide vs suicide prevention
June 18, 2018 at 8:50 am
(June 18, 2018 at 7:04 am)MasterX Wrote: 1) I think suicide is wrong morally, it's a selfish act that hurts people around you, which is not a moral thing to do, neither is it moral to take your life while not terminally ill or something similar.
2) But you just said below you don't consider suicide wrong so this is kind of self-refuting here to say that you don't think it's moral to tell them suicide is okay...
They have the right, doesn't mean it was right to do or told it's a privilege. The people around them friends/family who knew before hand that did nothing I feel hold some responsibility, but ultimately it's on the person who did it. I'm not saying condoning this is an actual legal crime, but to me it's immoral to do nothing, if that makes sense. An extreme example is if you tell someone to kill themselves online, you can be charged with a crime if they do it.
Also thanks for the welcome, good to meet ya.
Below is an actual suicide note from someone. It doesn't appear that this woman's motivations were selfish. Not everyone's situation is simple and open to such generalized moral judgments.
https://theholydark.wordpress.com/2012/0...ide-notes/
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: assisted suicide vs suicide prevention
June 18, 2018 at 9:13 am
(June 18, 2018 at 8:50 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: (June 18, 2018 at 7:04 am)MasterX Wrote: 1) I think suicide is wrong morally, it's a selfish act that hurts people around you, which is not a moral thing to do, neither is it moral to take your life while not terminally ill or something similar.
2) But you just said below you don't consider suicide wrong so this is kind of self-refuting here to say that you don't think it's moral to tell them suicide is okay...
They have the right, doesn't mean it was right to do or told it's a privilege. The people around them friends/family who knew before hand that did nothing I feel hold some responsibility, but ultimately it's on the person who did it. I'm not saying condoning this is an actual legal crime, but to me it's immoral to do nothing, if that makes sense. An extreme example is if you tell someone to kill themselves online, you can be charged with a crime if they do it.
Also thanks for the welcome, good to meet ya.
Below is an actual suicide note from someone. It doesn't appear that this woman's motivations were selfish. Not everyone's situation is simple and open to such generalized moral judgments.
https://theholydark.wordpress.com/2012/0...ide-notes/ Vul stop you might actually make him see moral ambiguity
And agree it not always selfish it depends on the situation
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 12302
Threads: 125
Joined: January 11, 2010
Reputation:
45
RE: assisted suicide vs suicide prevention
June 18, 2018 at 9:29 am
(This post was last modified: June 18, 2018 at 9:32 am by Rev. Rye.)
Ah. I see your point. It’s a shame Perseus Project hasn’t bothered to put up an English translation for that particular work.
Comparing the Universal Oneness of All Life to Yo Mama since 2010.
I was born with the gift of laughter and a sense the world is mad.
Posts: 48
Threads: 0
Joined: June 17, 2018
Reputation:
1
RE: assisted suicide vs suicide prevention
June 18, 2018 at 12:37 pm
(This post was last modified: June 18, 2018 at 12:38 pm by MasterX.)
(June 18, 2018 at 8:50 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: (June 18, 2018 at 7:04 am)MasterX Wrote: 1) I think suicide is wrong morally, it's a selfish act that hurts people around you, which is not a moral thing to do, neither is it moral to take your life while not terminally ill or something similar.
2) But you just said below you don't consider suicide wrong so this is kind of self-refuting here to say that you don't think it's moral to tell them suicide is okay...
They have the right, doesn't mean it was right to do or told it's a privilege. The people around them friends/family who knew before hand that did nothing I feel hold some responsibility, but ultimately it's on the person who did it. I'm not saying condoning this is an actual legal crime, but to me it's immoral to do nothing, if that makes sense. An extreme example is if you tell someone to kill themselves online, you can be charged with a crime if they do it.
Also thanks for the welcome, good to meet ya.
Below is an actual suicide note from someone. It doesn't appear that this woman's motivations were selfish. Not everyone's situation is simple and open to such generalized moral judgments.
https://theholydark.wordpress.com/2012/0...ide-notes/
This is a case of terminal illness which I hold no ill will against someone deciding to go at that point. I thought I said that?
(June 18, 2018 at 9:13 am)Tizheruk Wrote: (June 18, 2018 at 8:50 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: Below is an actual suicide note from someone. It doesn't appear that this woman's motivations were selfish. Not everyone's situation is simple and open to such generalized moral judgments.
https://theholydark.wordpress.com/2012/0...ide-notes/ Vul stop you might actually make him see moral ambiguity
And agree it not always selfish it depends on the situation
What? I already conceded that provable terminal illness is an excuse to commit suicide. LOL then you agree at the end there is selfish suicide, you clearly didn't read what I said.
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: assisted suicide vs suicide prevention
June 18, 2018 at 12:46 pm
Quote:What? I already conceded that provable terminal illness is an excuse to commit suicide. LOL then you agree at the end there is selfish suicide, you clearly didn't read what I said.
Lol reread my comment
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 48
Threads: 0
Joined: June 17, 2018
Reputation:
1
RE: assisted suicide vs suicide prevention
June 18, 2018 at 12:46 pm
(June 18, 2018 at 12:46 pm)Tizheruk Wrote: Quote:What? I already conceded that provable terminal illness is an excuse to commit suicide. LOL then you agree at the end there is selfish suicide, you clearly didn't read what I said.
Lol reread my comment
Yeah, you're claiming I don't have moral ambiguity on this subject, which is a straw man and intellectually dishonest. The end.
Posts: 5813
Threads: 86
Joined: November 19, 2017
Reputation:
59
RE: assisted suicide vs suicide prevention
June 18, 2018 at 1:46 pm
(June 18, 2018 at 12:37 pm)MasterX Wrote: This is a case of terminal illness which I hold no ill will against someone deciding to go at that point. I thought I said that?
Sure. But what say you about the the remarks from Seneca quoted here?
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: assisted suicide vs suicide prevention
June 18, 2018 at 2:33 pm
(This post was last modified: June 18, 2018 at 2:40 pm by Amarok.)
Quote:Yeah, you're claiming I don't have moral ambiguity on this subject,
Never said that i said "Vul stop you might actually make him see moral ambiguity" nowhere is the statement am i saying you have no level of ambiguity at all just lack of it not absence in the complete . If i was going to say that i would have said "Vul stop you might actually make him doubt his moral absolutism " or somthing along those lines .
Quote:which is a straw man and intellectually dishonest.
It would be if that's what i had said nor implied
Quote:The end.
Yes of your bullshit accusations then yes
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
Posts: 11697
Threads: 117
Joined: November 5, 2016
Reputation:
43
RE: assisted suicide vs suicide prevention
June 18, 2018 at 3:51 pm
(June 17, 2018 at 9:00 am)vulcanlogician Wrote: Here's a bit of Stoic philosophy that I find relevant to the subject:
Seneca Wrote:You may consider that the same thing happens to us: life has carried some men with the greatest rapidity to the harbour, the harbour they were bound to reach even if they tarried on the way, while others it has fretted and harassed. To such a life, as you are aware, one should not always cling. For mere living is not a good, but living well. Accordingly, the wise man will live as long as he ought, not as long as he can. He will mark in what place, with whom, and how he is to conduct his existence, and what he is about to do. He always reflects concerning the quality, and not the quantity, of his life. As soon as there are many events in his life that give him trouble and disturb his peace of mind, he sets himself free. And this privilege is his, not only when the crisis is upon him, but as soon as Fortune seems to be playing him false; then he looks about carefully and sees whether he ought, or ought not, to end his life on that account. He holds that it makes no difference to him whether his taking-off be natural or self-inflicted, whether it comes later or earlier. He does not regard it with fear, as if it were a great loss; for no man can lose very much when but a driblet remains. It is not a question of dying earlier or later, but of dying well or ill. And dying well means escape from the danger of living ill.
https://emilkirkegaard.dk/en/?p=1999 Always loved the Stoic so poetic
Seek strength, not to be greater than my brother, but to fight my greatest enemy -- myself.
Inuit Proverb
|