Not just catholics!

[Fireball]

Trying to decide if drich is just that stupid, or a troll. I guess in the end, the only difference is bannage. I don't read the slavering drivel, but camon, people. at some point the chew toy is so saturated with spittle that it's not even worth a sniff. Amirite?

[LadyForCamus]

Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?

Yes, she should. Gee, that was tough.

Once again, Drich the good Christian, showing himself to be the most vile, immoral member of the forum. Child rape apologizing is a new low for you, man. I’m pretty happy with my pop morality that doesn’t condone adults having sex with ten year olds, you sick fuck.

[Drich]

Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?

Yes, she should. Gee, that was tough.

Once again, Drich the good Christian, showing himself to be the most vile, immoral member of the forum. Child rape apologizing is a new low for you, man. I’m pretty happy with my pop morality that doesn’t condone adults having sex with ten year olds, you sick fuck.

where was this answer a week ago? or the first time you address this... Oh, that's right you can now see where I am going and know how to answer so you can feign moral superiority..

what happened to the other 1/2 of the question? didn't understand how to answer that one?

---

why not? I debate with all you all the time.
 

 

Rape and Sexual Offences - Chapter 2: Sexual Offences Act 2003 - Principal Offences, and Sexual Offences Act 1956 - Most commonly charged offences


Section 8: Causing or inciting a child under 13 to engage in sexual activity
Section 8 makes it an offence for a person intentionally to cause or incite a child (B) under the age of 13 to engage in sexual activity.

I broke you...

Or are you just 'touched?'

look again at what the senerio is:

Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?

Hey stupid do you understand now?

Look at the highlighted portion douche...

 by every measure of the law this is rape,

Those are my words So why would I need a definition? oh that's right I don't... you do. you need to keep reminding yourself this is wrong so your own personal feeling don't spill out on page! Why else would you need to keep tellng yourself in an open forum that having sex with a 10 year old is rape? Because again no one is disputing it! i identify it from the very first post as rape! So again this defination must be for you

---

Trying to decide if drich is just that stupid, or a troll. I guess in the end, the only difference is bannage. I don't read the slavering drivel, but camon, people. at some point the chew toy is so saturated with spittle that it's not even worth a sniff. Amirite?

slavery? what post or thread are you responding to?

How is it you are not a troll seriously? you don't even have a clue as to the nature of the topic yet you have at least 3 personal insults here directed atme.


Here's some home work for you "smart guy" (IF I am stupid and everything I say is dumb and smart is the opposite of that, I guess that makes you the 'smart guy.')

So 'smart guy" who can not see his own hypocrisy/trolldom staring at him in his own face! I've got a home work assignment for you. (If you have any desire not showing as a hypocrite/troll) how about read a few posts before you just shite all over a thread you know little to nothing about outside of your peers being pwned and bleating for someone to help them save face...

[The Grand Nudger]

Still convinced that your own ignorance is, somehow, other people's "hypocrisy", I see.

[Drich]

Still convinced that your own ignorance is, somehow, other people's "hypocrisy", I see.

I see you are still convinced that you can make a character assassination attempt in a thread without having any idea what the content being discusses is all about!

I also see this is a semi common trait with you guys, as your fireball AKA crash and burn buddy did the same trollish thing but then also had the nerve to identify me a a troll, when you and he infact are the only two a people who makes deliberately offensive or provocative online posts.

Which makes him a what by literal defination?

Yes a hypocrite

[The Grand Nudger]

Your character was last seen dead on the side of the road to perdition, lol.  Nobody here had to kill it, you handled that all by your one-sies.

[madog]

Example let say a "very mature" 10 year old boy is 'raped/molested' first sexual experience with a 17 year old female baby sitter. by every measure of the law this is rape, but the boy was happy and the baby sitter was cool with it too. So should the girl get a 10 year prison sentence and be labeled a sex offender/predator for a child under the age of 12?

Hey stupid do you understand now?

 

How many fucking times do I have to answer you?

I consider the above rape  .... you have agreed the law also agrees with me, yet even after all this time you haven't agreed its rape 

Your rambling rant pointing out the "very mature" "10 year old boy" was "happy" as an excuse impresses no one 

I clearly stated  ... the law aside .... (see my quote from earlier in this thread)

I consider a 17 year old having sex with a 10 year old  wrong .... punishment, if any, is beyond my paygrade, even if you had given sufficient information to even attempt an opinion .... 

But  .... I repeat ...

"Its not just about the immediate act, but how it effects the victims whole life "

It was your answer toi the above that showed me what a piece of shit you are   (see your answer below)

Or it can be used as a life lesson, build a foundation that strengthen a person's core and their abilities and sensibilities unlike anything else they can experience in life.

[Deesse23]

Drich is some batshit crazy motherfucker. Fucking lunatic.

[Amarok]

Hey stupid do you understand now?

 

How many fucking times do I have to answer you?

I consider the above rape  .... you have agreed the law also agrees with me, yet even after all this time you haven't agreed its rape 

Your rambling rant pointing out the "very mature" "10 year old boy" was "happy" as an excuse impresses no one 

I clearly stated  ... the law aside .... (see my quote from earlier in this thread)

I consider a 17 year old having sex with a 10 year old  wrong .... punishment, if any, is beyond my paygrade, even if you had given sufficient information to even attempt an opinion .... 

But  .... I repeat ...

"Its not just about the immediate act, but how it effects the victims whole life "

It was your answer toi the above that showed me what a piece of shit you are   (see your answer below)

Or it can be used as a life lesson, build a foundation that strengthen a person's core and their abilities and sensibilities unlike anything else they can experience in life.

Holy shit is he trying to argue rape is a lesson  

[madog]

How many fucking times do I have to answer you?

I consider the above rape  .... you have agreed the law also agrees with me, yet even after all this time you haven't agreed its rape 

Your rambling rant pointing out the "very mature" "10 year old boy" was "happy" as an excuse impresses no one 

I clearly stated  ... the law aside .... (see my quote from earlier in this thread)





It was your answer toi the above that showed me what a piece of shit you are   (see your answer below)

Holy shit is he trying to argue rape is a lesson  

Trying to tie him down is an excersize in tryng to point out a tap dancing routine  .... you point to one move and he ignores the rest of his routine 

He started with pooping and pissing on people then went to raping children, raping wives, when he wanted to fuck them an hour after she wanted to say "no" ... he is a fucking pervert