Why not dismiss the trinitarian belief outright

[R00tKiT]

I am reading Craig's article about this 

Nope. Once you cited the lying scum WLC, you were done. That was the end of it.

Why is Craig lying ? Is he presenting trinity inaccurately ?

[Peebothuhlu]

At work.

Nope. Once you cited the lying scum WLC, you were done. That was the end of it.

Why is Craig lying ? Is he presenting trinity inaccurately ?

Not that Craig is lying about the Trinity. That Craig is known to be dishonest.

Hence using something that is untrustworthy as a source/foundation tends to leave the rest/following thoughts on dubious terms/territory. Is all.

Cheers.

[Angrboda]

Oh look, Muslims debating Christian theology. You don't see that every day.

[Peebothuhlu]

At work.

Oh look, Muslims debating Christian theology. You don't see that every day.

You're obviously not watching the right Youtube channels, then.

[Abaddon_ire]

Nope. Once you cited the lying scum WLC, you were done. That was the end of it.

Why is Craig lying ? Is he presenting trinity inaccurately ?

The trinity is entirely imaginary. Of course he is lying his butt off. It isn't real. 

WLC might as well be discussing the trinity of Santa, Rudolph and the head elf.

[R00tKiT]

At work.

Why is Craig lying ? Is he presenting trinity inaccurately ?

Not that Craig is lying about the Trinity. That Craig is known to be dishonest.

Do you have any concrete examples showing that he's dishonest? Craig is after all one of the leading christian theologians today, I doubt he made a mistake while presenting a basic christian belief.

Hence using something that is untrustworthy as a source/foundation tends to leave the rest/following thoughts on dubious terms/territory.  Is all.

 Cheers.

Okay. What would be the formulation of trinity instead.. according to you?

[onlinebiker]

It works mathematically.


3 x 0 = 0.


Woo to the nth power is still woo....

[Abaddon_ire]

Do you have any concrete examples showing that he's dishonest?

yup. is your google somehow broken?

Craig is after all one of the leading christian theologians today, I doubt he made a mistake while presenting a basic christian belief.

Have you not seen craig debating other christians? It is funny as fuck. Once again, is your google broken?
And what fucking use is a theologian?

Okay. What would be the formulation of trinity instead.. according to you?

Superstitious crap.

[R00tKiT]

Woo to the nth power is still woo....

0^0=1 though..

---

Do you have any concrete examples showing that he's dishonest?

yup. is your google somehow broken?

Craig is after all one of the leading christian theologians today, I doubt he made a mistake while presenting a basic christian belief.

Have you not seen craig debating other christians? It is funny as fuck. Once again, is your google broken?
And what fucking use is a theologian?

Okay. What would be the formulation of trinity instead.. according to you?

Superstitious crap.

There is plenty of contradictory information on the internet about whether Craig is accurately presenting christianity or not.... I was hoping somebody has some clear example in mind of Craig being dishonest

[Abaddon_ire]

Woo to the nth power is still woo....

0^0=1 though..

---

yup. is your google somehow broken?

Have you not seen craig debating other christians? It is funny as fuck. Once again, is your google broken?
And what fucking use is a theologian?

Superstitious crap.

There is plenty of contradictory information on the internet about whether Craig is accurately presenting christianity or not.... I was hoping somebody has some clear example in mind of Craig being dishonest

Plenty. But why would I bother. You lied when you claimed that 0^0=1. Why would anyone engage a liar?