Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 12, 2024, 2:07 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Supreme Court to decide if corporations can be sued for human rights abuses
#11
RE: Supreme Court to decide if corporations can be sued for human rights abuses
To quote a guy I saw on The Daily Show, "I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one."
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
Reply
#12
RE: Supreme Court to decide if corporations can be sued for human rights abuses
(February 25, 2012 at 8:58 pm)Tiberius Wrote: IMO, the Supreme Court declaring corporations as people doesn't make them people Tongue

Nobody said it does. In law it's a called 'deeming'

A cat may be deemed to be dog for the purpose of law(s).

Deeming a corporation to be person in law [in specific ways beneficial to the owners] is a graphic example of the golden rule in action:IE them that has the gold makes the rules.Wink Shades
Reply
#13
RE: Supreme Court to decide if corporations can be sued for human rights abuses
(February 25, 2012 at 8:41 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Corporations shouldn't get the benefits of citizenship in the first place. They aren't people; they are merely made up of people. Why should an entire corporation suffer for the crimes of a few people in it? People can be easily replaced in a company, but if the entire company is sued and taken down, how many jobs will be lost?

One of the benefits of incorporation is it shields the owner (stock holders) from personal liability for the actions of the business they own. This is accomplished by shifting the legal liability from the stock holders to the corporation. If you want to protect the corporation from liability you need to shift the liability back to the owners again.

Save a life. Adopt a greyhound.
[Image: JUkLw58.gif]
Reply
#14
RE: Supreme Court to decide if corporations can be sued for human rights abuses
(February 25, 2012 at 11:02 pm)popeyespappy Wrote:
(February 25, 2012 at 8:41 pm)Tiberius Wrote: Corporations shouldn't get the benefits of citizenship in the first place. They aren't people; they are merely made up of people. Why should an entire corporation suffer for the crimes of a few people in it? People can be easily replaced in a company, but if the entire company is sued and taken down, how many jobs will be lost?

One of the benefits of incorporation is it shields the owner (stock holders) from personal liability for the actions of the business they own. This is accomplished by shifting the legal liability from the stock holders to the corporation. If you want to protect the corporation from liability you need to shift the liability back to the owners again.

Surely the language in this ruling will be fuzzy enough to allow corporations the greatest protection and benefit possible. All responsibility will but deflected from stockholder, board of directors, and the corporation in general.

Remember, this is a corporate oligarchy that we are living in. If any fault is to be had, it will be to the common citizen. Any damages will be paid for by the tax payer and not from the corporation in question. If a corporation is made to pay a fine, it will merely be temporary until the tax payers forget about it, in which case politicians will transfer wealth back to the corporations.

If you have a decent amount of money to invest. I would give this advice to you:

Start a business. It doesnt matter what kind it is. Then use that money to invest in a politician. Dont be picky. Take half of that money and give it to the Republicans, take the other half and give it to the democrats. This way whoever wins you still win. Once your politician investment is in office, come to collect. Watch how quick you get no bid contracts with huge amounts of profit.

Stow some of the profit away for your future political investment. In 3 years take that investment money, split it in half, and buy the Republican and democrat party again.
Reply
#15
RE: Supreme Court to decide if corporations can be sued for human rights abuses
That's just "good business" Rev. You put your resources where they will benefit you most. Wink
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Reply
#16
RE: Supreme Court to decide if corporations can be sued for human rights abuses
Quote:If you want to protect the corporation from liability you need to shift the liability back to the owners again.

Remember criminal liability is different. When corporations break the law - which they do with impunity in the US - the officers of the corporation can be charged not the corporation itself. The corporation can be fined but the officers who steal millions get to go to a country club "prison" and play golf while a guy who steals 50 bucks from a gas station gets 30 years in a real prison getting it up the ass every night.

I find myself agreeing with divi Tiberio that they should not be considered persons in any sense. Of course, the SC is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of these corporate cocksuckers so I suspect that both of us shall continue to be disappointed.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Innocence is not enough for the Supreme Court... Rev. Rye 7 738 May 27, 2022 at 6:20 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  Navalny’s speech from court Fake Messiah 3 368 February 5, 2021 at 5:36 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  Why you should fear Trump's pick for Supreme Court Judge Silver 75 5942 October 31, 2020 at 10:52 am
Last Post: TaraJo
  Amy Coney Barnett officially confirmed as Supreme Court Justice Rev. Rye 33 3301 October 28, 2020 at 3:01 pm
Last Post: Rev. Rye
  Civil Rights. Gawdzilla Sama 12 1376 October 20, 2020 at 7:41 am
Last Post: Gawdzilla Sama
  Expanding The Supreme Court onlinebiker 94 6471 September 30, 2020 at 1:32 pm
Last Post: Secular Elf
  UK Supreme Court: Suspending Parliament was unlawful zebo-the-fat 6 826 September 25, 2019 at 1:16 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  U.S. withdrawing from UN Human Rights Council? Silver 26 3632 June 23, 2018 at 1:51 am
Last Post: Joods
  The Rights disdain of Hillary, where does it come from? GODZILLA 89 14137 March 21, 2018 at 1:46 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic
  Dear Texass, This Is What You Get For Not Regulating Corporations Minimalist 16 2392 March 16, 2018 at 11:27 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)