Posts: 67218
Threads: 140
Joined: June 28, 2011
Reputation:
162
RE: Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts
June 5, 2013 at 11:10 am
(This post was last modified: June 5, 2013 at 11:14 am by The Grand Nudger.)
Guess we're going to have to add electronics to the list of shit they don't talk about at madrassa.
Any gate is "pumping out" data all by it's onesies regardless of whatever state it happens to be in at any time or how it got to that state (and gates needn't have anyone or anything designing them to be such to function as gates). You don't think of it this way because that data is choked off (to you) at the level of the interface. As far as how this might apply to biology - you're going to have to work that one out yourself.
I am the Infantry. I am my country’s strength in war, her deterrent in peace. I am the heart of the fight… wherever, whenever. I carry America’s faith and honor against her enemies. I am the Queen of Battle. I am what my country expects me to be, the best trained Soldier in the world. In the race for victory, I am swift, determined, and courageous, armed with a fierce will to win. Never will I fail my country’s trust. Always I fight on…through the foe, to the objective, to triumph overall. If necessary, I will fight to my death. By my steadfast courage, I have won more than 200 years of freedom. I yield not to weakness, to hunger, to cowardice, to fatigue, to superior odds, For I am mentally tough, physically strong, and morally straight. I forsake not, my country, my mission, my comrades, my sacred duty. I am relentless. I am always there, now and forever. I AM THE INFANTRY! FOLLOW ME!
Posts: 1401
Threads: 7
Joined: March 6, 2013
Reputation:
36
RE: Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts
June 8, 2013 at 12:32 pm
Where's the proof of intelligent design?
All I saw was proof of an individual with a stunning incompetence at understanding evolutionary processes.
freedomfromfallacy » I'm weighing my tears to see if the happy ones weigh the same as the sad ones.
Posts: 508
Threads: 17
Joined: February 25, 2013
Reputation:
3
RE: Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts
June 19, 2013 at 9:05 am
(June 8, 2013 at 12:32 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: Where's the proof of intelligent design?
All I saw was proof of an individual with a stunning incompetence at understanding evolutionary processes. The proof is that complicated instincts cannot happen by a coincidence.
Posts: 5170
Threads: 364
Joined: September 25, 2012
Reputation:
61
RE: Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts
June 19, 2013 at 9:07 am
(June 19, 2013 at 9:05 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: The proof is that complicated instincts cannot happen by a coincidence.
They dont. And evolution doesn`t claim that.
What you just did, was creating a strawman.
What I just did, was setting it on fire and handing it back to you.
Posts: 1353
Threads: 44
Joined: April 21, 2013
Reputation:
18
RE: Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts
June 19, 2013 at 9:08 am
(This post was last modified: June 19, 2013 at 9:09 am by Dragonetti.)
Again, your lack of understanding evolution and simple biology is cemented by your posts. Your educators should feel shame for their product.
Imagination will often carry us to worlds that never were. But without it we go nowhere. - Carl Sagan
Professional Watcher of The Daily Show and The Colbert Report!
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts
June 19, 2013 at 7:58 pm
(June 19, 2013 at 9:05 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: The proof is that complicated instincts cannot happen by a coincidence.
Has anyone else noticed that this idiot has changed his position mid stream? In the beginning he claimed he believed evolution happened, just that it was guided, but now he's arguing against evolution in general, what with this coincidence idiocy, and a couple of "evolution's just a theory!" in another thread.
... Why am I even surprised? 
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 1571
Threads: 179
Joined: October 14, 2010
Reputation:
35
RE: Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts
June 19, 2013 at 8:16 pm
(This post was last modified: June 19, 2013 at 8:17 pm by orogenicman.)
(June 19, 2013 at 9:05 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: (June 8, 2013 at 12:32 pm)Tartarus Sauce Wrote: Where's the proof of intelligent design?
All I saw was proof of an individual with a stunning incompetence at understanding evolutionary processes. The proof is that complicated instincts cannot happen by a coincidence.
We've been here already. Instincts evolve via natural selection, which is certainly NOT coincidental since natural selection does not occur by random chance.
'The difference between a Miracle and a Fact is exactly the difference between a mermaid and seal. It could not be expressed better.'
-- Samuel "Mark Twain" Clemens
"I think that in the discussion of natural problems we ought to begin not with the scriptures, but with experiments, demonstrations, and observations".
- Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)
"In short, Meyer has shown that his first disastrous book was not a fluke: he is capable of going into any field in which he has no training or research experience and botching it just as badly as he did molecular biology. As I've written before, if you are a complete amateur and don't understand a subject, don't demonstrate the Dunning-Kruger effect by writing a book about it and proving your ignorance to everyone else! "
- Dr. Donald Prothero
Posts: 508
Threads: 17
Joined: February 25, 2013
Reputation:
3
RE: Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts
June 23, 2013 at 6:03 am
(June 19, 2013 at 7:58 pm)Esquilax Wrote: (June 19, 2013 at 9:05 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: The proof is that complicated instincts cannot happen by a coincidence.
Has anyone else noticed that this idiot has changed his position mid stream? In the beginning he claimed he believed evolution happened, just that it was guided, but now he's arguing against evolution in general, I'm in favor of that but not very strongly!
and that what I said from beginning "If evolution happened"
Also it is you that start diverting the discussion
because you will feel more comfortable debating evolution itself than debating intelligence, because you will be much weaker there.
Posts: 11260
Threads: 61
Joined: January 5, 2013
Reputation:
123
RE: Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts
June 23, 2013 at 10:10 am
(June 23, 2013 at 6:03 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: I'm in favor of that but not very strongly!
and that what I said from beginning "If evolution happened"
Also it is you that start diverting the discussion
because you will feel more comfortable debating evolution itself than debating intelligence, because you will be much weaker there.
You would need to demonstrate that a creative intelligence exists before we even begin discussing it. You have not, though you seem to think you have. Do so, and then maybe you'll have a claim for your derision over our ability to debate it.
Does it bother you that you've been proved wrong with science on every point you've broached in these threads?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects!
Posts: 1424
Threads: 65
Joined: February 11, 2013
Reputation:
26
RE: Intelligent Design, Proof VI - Instincts
June 23, 2013 at 12:06 pm
(This post was last modified: June 23, 2013 at 12:06 pm by CleanShavenJesus.)
(June 23, 2013 at 6:03 am)Muslim Scholar Wrote: Also it is you that start diverting the discussion
because you will feel more comfortable debating evolution itself than debating intelligence, because you will be much weaker there.
A nice jab to show that you have no clue what you're doing anymore. And you prefer to debate intelligent design rather than evolution, because you would be weaker there.
Actually, you're already pretty weak with intelligent design. I'd hate to see you try to debate evolution.
ronedee Wrote:Science doesn't have a good explaination for water
|
![[Image: YAAgdMk.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i.imgur.com%2FYAAgdMk.gif)
