Jesus had more sources than any ten figures combined within 150 years of their death, so would it be fair to say someone else existed but Jesus didn't?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 25, 2024, 7:25 am
Thread Rating:
Why Should Someone Be an Atheist?
|
I really don't know what's so hard to grasp here.
Look at the movie, The Titanic. James Cameron wrote a complete fictional story and weaved it in seamlessly to documented real history. There really was a Titanic, an iceberg, a shipwreck, and 1500 lives lost. 1000 years from now, are we going to have some buffoon trying to tell people that Jack and Rose were real passengers and there was a great struggle over a big blue diamond??? Because that's the logic you're trying to sell here. Just because the Bible has some legitimate historical locations and people doesn't mean that there was some demigod walking around doing magic and coming back from the dead. I mean seriously, how do you not get this?!? (December 23, 2013 at 4:58 am)savedwheat Wrote: Jesus had more sources than any ten figures combined within 150 years of their death, so would it be fair to say someone else existed but Jesus didn't? No, he didn't. There are no contemporary accounts of his life by anyone who actually saw him. And if you can produce some, you're doing better than the Catholic Church. If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
It's true Jesus had more sources written about him than any ten figures combined from antiquity within 150 years of their death.
Pick any ten figures, and I will go over the 45 sources for Jesus. (December 23, 2013 at 5:05 am)savedwheat Wrote: It's true Jesus had more sources written about him than any ten figures combined from antiquity within 150 years of their death. None of those sources were contemporary with his life, I assure you. How can they be taken as confirmation of his existence, if he was long gone before they were born?
"YOU take the hard look in the mirror. You are everything that is wrong with this world. The only thing important to you, is you." - ronedee
Want to see more of my writing? Check out my (safe for work!) site, Unprotected Sects! (December 23, 2013 at 5:05 am)savedwheat Wrote: It's true Jesus had more sources written about him than any ten figures combined from antiquity within 150 years of their death. Lots and lots of people have written about jesus. That doesn't mean anything. I once wrote a term paper on The City of Atlantis. Guess what, lots of people have. ... so what? It proves nothing. RE: Why Should Someone Be an Atheist?
December 23, 2013 at 5:11 am
(This post was last modified: December 23, 2013 at 5:12 am by Fidel_Castronaut.)
(December 23, 2013 at 4:19 am)savedwheat Wrote: What would convince you that God exists?What's a god? (December 23, 2013 at 4:50 am)savedwheat Wrote: The eyewitnesses involved their eyes, so a delusion couldn't apply here. People have said they've seen the loch ness monster. Your point? Love atheistforums.org? Consider becoming a patreon and helping towards our server costs.
What sources for anyone are contemporary in antiquity? The earliest sources we have are hundreds if not thousands of years later for others? Yet we accept those figures existed.
(December 23, 2013 at 5:13 am)savedwheat Wrote: What sources for anyone are contemporary in antiquity? The earliest sources we have are hundreds if not thousands of years later for others? Yet we accept those figures existed. This is not proof that Jesus existed. If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
Then we don't know anyone who lived before Jesus by your same standard. What historian takes that position?
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)