Where did the universe come from? Atheistic origin science has no answer.

[Anomalocaris]

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index...656AATgFGx

Q: Can you have a decimal in a fraction?

A: no. a decimal represents a fraction

seems like I have a new sig, thanks for the laugh.

You know, answer.yahoo is second only to the bible in fecklessness, right?

[Huggy Bear]

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/index...656AATgFGx


seems like I have a new sig, thanks for the laugh.

You know, answer.yahoo is second only to the bible in fecklessness, right?

Just for the record, are you saying this isn't true, and that in fact a fraction can include a decimal?

[Anomalocaris]

You know, answer.yahoo is second only to the bible in fecklessness, right?

Just for the record, are you saying this isn't true?

1.0 / 2.0


34/23.7 = 340/237

[Huggy Bear]

Just for the record, are you saying this isn't true?

1.0 / 2.0

you fool, the proper way to write that fraction is 1/2 you don't include decimal points. the decimal version of 1/2 is .5...smh

and in what world does 23.7 = 237?

[Chas]

I honestly think Huggy might have a visual problem. He doesn't seem to be able to see the posts that directly answer his questions. Is that a prerequisite for LASIK?

Just answer this simple question.

Is 34/23.7 a fraction?

Yes. And it is a ratio.

[Cyberman]

I don't know how I can misconstrue the phrase "There is no such thing as fibonacci sequence" as meaning he doesn't believe the fibonacci sequence exists.
I think anyone familiar with the English language would come to the same conclusion.

I never said you misconstrued it. I said you cherry-picked it out of the post without any of the context of the rest of it, in which Chuck goes on to clarify what he means.

By the same tactic, I can quote you as saying in your above words "I don't believe the fibonacci sequence exists."

That's what cherry-picking means.

[FatAndFaithless]

All hail Huggy, the determiner of convenient definitions and master of innumeracy.

[Anomalocaris]

1.0 / 2.0

you fool, the proper way to write that fraction is 1/2 you don't include decimal points. the decimal version of 1/2 is .5...smh

That is technically not called the proper way of writting it. It is technically the vulgar (look it up) way of writting it.

You nincompoop.

---

1.0 / 2.0

and in what world does 23.7 = 237?

You never reached fractions in you "education", and have no idea how they work beyond what you can look up in answer.yahoo, have you? Even 30 seconds of reading Wikipedia give enough basis for understanding fraction operation to make you look dumb.

[Chas]

1.0 / 2.0

you fool, the proper way to write that fraction is 1/2 you don't include decimal points. the decimal version of 1/2 is .5...smh

and in what world does 23.7 = 237?

It seems like you only half listened in math class.

12.5/25 = 125/250 = 1.0/2.0 = 1/2 = 0.5 = .5 = 12/24 = 12000/24000 = 0.03/0.06

These are all valid ways of representing the same value.
They are all the same number, the are all the same ratio.

[Huggy Bear]

you fool, the proper way to write that fraction is 1/2 you don't include decimal points. the decimal version of 1/2 is .5...smh

That is technically not called the proper way of writting it. It is technically the vulgar (look it up) way of writting it.

You nincompoop.

---

you fool, the proper way to write that fraction is 1/2 you don't include decimal points. the decimal version of 1/2 is .5...smh

and in what world does 23.7 = 237?

You never reached fractions in you "education", and have no idea how they work beyond what you can look up in answer.yahoo, have you?

look you muppet, we made it clear that as it relates 34 to the length of DNA and the 23.7 the width.. THIS WAS NEVER A FRACTION IN THE FIRST PLACE. We are talking whole numbers.

So no 23.7 does not equal 237