RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 13, 2014 at 3:35 pm
How the heck did I believe in Islam?
Poll: Should Gays have rights in society? This poll is closed. |
|||
Yes, this is their natural right to be gay. | 13 | 92.86% | |
No, being gay is not natural therefore they have no natural right to be gay. | 0 | 0% | |
No, being gay is against a Divine Command and therefore they have no rights but be subject to punishment! | 0 | 0% | |
Yes, this is not a natural right but Gays have rights to be Gay no matter the circumstances and social templates. | 1 | 7.14% | |
Total | 14 vote(s) | 100% |
* You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
|
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 13, 2014 at 3:35 pm
How the heck did I believe in Islam?
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 13, 2014 at 3:38 pm
I didn't use the Bible there
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 13, 2014 at 3:39 pm
(This post was last modified: October 13, 2014 at 3:40 pm by DramaQueen.)
Exactly, you contradict it
Sometimes RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 13, 2014 at 3:39 pm
(This post was last modified: October 13, 2014 at 3:40 pm by FatAndFaithless.)
You literally just fucking used Jesus as a reason. And, as DQ said above, you're directly contradicting Leviticus if you think that it would be immoral to put two men to death for having sex.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 13, 2014 at 3:40 pm
Ok I'm lost and can't keep up
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 13, 2014 at 3:41 pm
I didn't contradict the bible I just read and believed .
RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 13, 2014 at 3:44 pm
(October 13, 2014 at 3:41 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I didn't contradict the bible I just read and believed . Leviticus states that the appropriate punishment for two men having sex, is death. You're saying that punishment would be immoral. So, are you conceding that certain ideas in the Bible are immoral? Because there certainly isn't a passage saying NOT to kill two men who have gay sex, and there most certainly is one saying you SHOULD do it.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 13, 2014 at 3:47 pm
(October 13, 2014 at 3:44 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote:At the time it was moral but now there is forgiveness.(October 13, 2014 at 3:41 pm)C4RM5 Wrote: I didn't contradict the bible I just read and believed . RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 13, 2014 at 3:49 pm
(October 13, 2014 at 3:47 pm)C4RM5 Wrote:(October 13, 2014 at 3:44 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: Leviticus states that the appropriate punishment for two men having sex, is death. You're saying that punishment would be immoral. So, are you conceding that certain ideas in the Bible are immoral? Because there certainly isn't a passage saying NOT to kill two men who have gay sex, and there most certainly is one saying you SHOULD do it.At the time it was moral but now there is forgiveness. So the laws of the old testament don't apply? You literally said earlier that it's the father's choice to force his daughter to marry her rapist, and that would be a morally fine situation, based on the laws of the old testament.
In every country and every age, the priest had been hostile to Liberty.
- Thomas Jefferson RE: Gay rights within the template of religion proves flaws in "religion"
October 13, 2014 at 3:50 pm
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|