Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 28, 2024, 4:34 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
The New York Choke Hold Case
#81
RE: The New York Choke Hold Case
(December 5, 2014 at 10:39 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: He's asking pretty much the same question I asked earlier in this thread, and you missed the sarcasm of the question both times. What good are body cameras if a police officer can murder someone on video and still not worry about even an indictment? If our justice system doesn't actually hold cops accountable for their actions, even when they are on video, then body cams aren't going to stop police brutality.

Or, maybe you aren't blind to the obvious sarcasm and you're intentionally misconstruing Congressman Gregory's words as if to suggest he is against the idea of body cams, because that's just the sort of dishonest fuckery you always do, the kind of dishonest fuckery you have to do, to try to score a point off the 'left'.

What you and the congressman fail to realize is that the camera's provide the evidence to show the laws need to be changed so that in cases like Gardner's police brutality can be prosecuted. What good did the video do? Well it convinced a whole lot of people that yeah....maybe we should change the way the laws treat police.

But you guys on the left...you like crap like this. You arn't really interested in solving problems. You want to keep bitching about problems...use those problems to demonize your enemies...and convince the dummies of the world that if they put you in power....you will solve them.
Reply
#82
RE: The New York Choke Hold Case
Facepalm grow up Heywood. There's no way you're dense enough to actually believe that either of them meant they don't think the police should wear the body cams.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
#83
RE: The New York Choke Hold Case
(December 5, 2014 at 11:08 pm)Heywood Wrote: But you guys on the left...you like crap like this. You arn't really interested in solving problems. You want to keep bitching about problems...use those problems to demonize your enemies...and convince the dummies of the world that if they put you in power....you will solve them.
...As opposed to "the right," who never bitch unless there is a legitimate grievance, never politicize any of the world's miseries or demonize their opponents, and only reluctantly accept power so that they can better the plight of those most unfortunate among us.

ROFLOL
He who loves God cannot endeavour that God should love him in return - Baruch Spinoza
Reply
#84
RE: The New York Choke Hold Case
(December 6, 2014 at 12:38 am)Losty Wrote: Facepalm grow up Heywood. There's no way you're dense enough to actually believe that either of them meant they don't think the police should wear the body cams.


I disagree. He is surely dense enough.
Reply
#85
RE: The New York Choke Hold Case
(December 6, 2014 at 2:21 am)Minimalist Wrote:
(December 6, 2014 at 12:38 am)Losty Wrote: Facepalm grow up Heywood. There's no way you're dense enough to actually believe that either of them meant they don't think the police should wear the body cams.


I disagree. He is surely dense enough.

He is dishonest enough. Being disingenuous is Heywood's favorite debate tactic.
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
#86
RE: The New York Choke Hold Case
(December 6, 2014 at 12:38 am)Losty Wrote: Facepalm grow up Heywood. There's no way you're dense enough to actually believe that either of them meant they don't think the police should wear the body cams.

Gardner's mother was asked about body cams and she claimed they were a waste of money. She was sincere about that. I do think that many on the left are simply too stupid to realize that change happens in steps. Cops do need a little leeway in doing their job....body camera's will tell us if they have too much leeway or not enough. Nobody with half a brain should even question their utility......unless of course they aren't actually interested in solving the problem.
Reply
#87
RE: The New York Choke Hold Case
(December 6, 2014 at 1:18 pm)Heywood Wrote:
(December 6, 2014 at 12:38 am)Losty Wrote: Facepalm grow up Heywood. There's no way you're dense enough to actually believe that either of them meant they don't think the police should wear the body cams.

Gardner's mother was asked about body cams and she claimed they were a waste of money. She was sincere about that. I do think that many on the left are simply too stupid to realize that change happens in steps. Cops do need a little leeway in doing their job....body camera's will tell us if they have too much leeway or not enough. Nobody with half a brain should even question their utility......unless of course they aren't actually interested in solving the problem.
you seriously need medication if you believe that
Reply
#88
RE: The New York Choke Hold Case
(December 6, 2014 at 2:46 pm)simplemoss Wrote:
(December 6, 2014 at 1:18 pm)Heywood Wrote: Gardner's mother was asked about body cams and she claimed they were a waste of money. She was sincere about that. I do think that many on the left are simply too stupid to realize that change happens in steps. Cops do need a little leeway in doing their job....body camera's will tell us if they have too much leeway or not enough. Nobody with half a brain should even question their utility......unless of course they aren't actually interested in solving the problem.
you seriously need medication if you believe that

You seriously need medication if you don't believe problems get left unsolved out of political expediency.

The left has no incentive to solve immigration because the moment they do so....they no longer have a wedge issue. They no longer have a good reason to convince latinos to vote for them.
Reply
#89
RE: The New York Choke Hold Case
Neither side has a good reason to solve immigration Heywood
(August 21, 2017 at 11:31 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: "I'm not a troll"
Religious Views: He gay

0/10

Hammy Wrote:and we also have a sheep on our bed underneath as well
Reply
#90
RE: The New York Choke Hold Case
(December 6, 2014 at 2:53 pm)Losty Wrote: Neither side has a good reason to solve immigration Heywood

I'm glad you see it that way. This is the smartest thing I have heard you say in a while.
Reply



Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Help me out here. Barrett and voting case. Brian37 31 4565 October 30, 2020 at 11:47 am
Last Post: The Architect Of Fate
  Hold On To Your Asses For "Dynamic Scoring" Minimalist 13 1709 August 2, 2017 at 8:45 pm
Last Post: The Industrial Atheist
  The WLB Effect Is Starting To Take Hold Minimalist 0 671 July 6, 2017 at 1:15 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  The Republicunts Will Hold A Vote on Wedon'tCare Minimalist 28 5693 May 5, 2017 at 2:42 pm
Last Post: brewer
  Time for The WLB To Hold Another Rally, I Guess Minimalist 4 1589 April 30, 2017 at 7:09 pm
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  New York Times, CNN, others barred from press briefing Aegon 93 16827 February 27, 2017 at 1:48 pm
Last Post: I_am_not_mafia
  Trump put call with Putin on hold to ask his aides to explain our nuclear arms treaty Aegon 43 8086 February 14, 2017 at 10:34 am
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  RE: The positive case for voting Donald Trump for president. Minimalist 200 27719 November 8, 2016 at 4:26 pm
Last Post: Pat Mustard
  The positive case for voting Hillary Clinton for president. Whateverist 113 17055 November 7, 2016 at 11:54 pm
Last Post: Edwardo Piet
  Actual case of voter fraud Doubting Thomas 10 1852 October 31, 2016 at 6:33 pm
Last Post: Neo-Scholastic



Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)