RE: The New York Choke Hold Case
December 5, 2014 at 11:08 pm
(This post was last modified: December 5, 2014 at 11:09 pm by Heywood.)
(December 5, 2014 at 10:39 pm)Ryantology (╯°◊°)╯︵ ══╬ Wrote: He's asking pretty much the same question I asked earlier in this thread, and you missed the sarcasm of the question both times. What good are body cameras if a police officer can murder someone on video and still not worry about even an indictment? If our justice system doesn't actually hold cops accountable for their actions, even when they are on video, then body cams aren't going to stop police brutality.
Or, maybe you aren't blind to the obvious sarcasm and you're intentionally misconstruing Congressman Gregory's words as if to suggest he is against the idea of body cams, because that's just the sort of dishonest fuckery you always do, the kind of dishonest fuckery you have to do, to try to score a point off the 'left'.
What you and the congressman fail to realize is that the camera's provide the evidence to show the laws need to be changed so that in cases like Gardner's police brutality can be prosecuted. What good did the video do? Well it convinced a whole lot of people that yeah....maybe we should change the way the laws treat police.
But you guys on the left...you like crap like this. You arn't really interested in solving problems. You want to keep bitching about problems...use those problems to demonize your enemies...and convince the dummies of the world that if they put you in power....you will solve them.