Posts: 5706
Threads: 67
Joined: June 13, 2014
Reputation:
69
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 16, 2014 at 10:52 pm
How can you have more than one omnipotent being? Either they can't best each other in which case they aren't omnipotent; or they can each best the other in which case they aren't omnipotent.
If there is a god, I want to believe that there is a god. If there is not a god, I want to believe that there is no god.
Posts: 30842
Threads: 204
Joined: July 19, 2011
Reputation:
141
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 1:06 am
Clearly, H_M has reached the "bury them in bullshit" phase, and we've countered with "point and laugh". Right on schedule.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 3:02 am
We had this little rhyme when we were kids, not sure what the deal was:
I have the power
To pick up a flower
But it takes me an hour
Or more
Still more power than God. He can't even stop his followers getting banned on forums. Or maybe he equates it to his own sacrifice. About the same level of inconvenience caused.
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 5:38 am
(This post was last modified: December 17, 2014 at 5:41 am by robvalue.)
I think I can close this discussion out.
I just met god and he says you're completely wrong about everything. [Unfalsifiable claim]
Unless you can prove what I just said is wrong, then it is right and we win. [Theistic logic]
Pack up shop, we've seen it all now and it ain't pretty.
I'm happy to take a lack of response as a victory, too. [Theistic logic]
Posts: 1889
Threads: 53
Joined: December 13, 2014
Reputation:
35
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 8:52 am
(December 16, 2014 at 12:55 pm)His_Majesty Wrote: (December 15, 2014 at 10:05 pm)DeistPaladin Wrote: Maybe we can create a rule that limits the number you can use each year?
There are some rare occasions I've been inspired enough to use it. When it appears in every other post, sometimes multiple times, you're abusing it.
You people are campaigning to create rules to limit my effectiveness. Kinda reminds me of the Great Wilt Chamberlain..and how he used to dominate the NBA during the early days...the league implemented the 3 second rule in the paint because they couldn't let one man just completely dominate the rest of the league. ![ROFLOL ROFLOL](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/roflol.gif)
What a bunch of crybabies.
Yeah but you're not Michael Jordan. I could build a better case than you, since it's obvious you're not as well educated as you think you are. (And don't give me that "satan knows the word crap")
You and your faulty Bible are, and will continue limiting you, not the moderators. This is an obvious case of displaced frustration, and mods are the easiest target.
I reject your reality and substitute my own!
Posts: 29107
Threads: 218
Joined: August 9, 2014
Reputation:
155
RE: MERGED: The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus Christ (Part 1) & (Part 2)
December 17, 2014 at 9:04 am
(This post was last modified: December 17, 2014 at 9:04 am by robvalue.)
I think we won, that was a decent amount of time to respond. Well, good game all! No jesus today.
Debating is so easy with theistic logic.