Posts: 168
Threads: 15
Joined: March 10, 2015
Reputation:
3
RE: government controlling/monitoring child bearing
July 10, 2015 at 4:09 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 3:55 pm)Atheist_BG Wrote: (July 10, 2015 at 3:49 pm)QuarkDriven Wrote: the opnion of one on a particular matter doesnt reflect the the opinion of all within that .../religion/...
You're wrong. It only takes a few words from the herd's chief and the opinion of one changes the opinion of the herd.
I suppose you're right when it comes to "holy" books and scriptures...
QuarkDriven
KCCO
North NJ l USA l Earth
Milky Way l The Universe
Posts: 7085
Threads: 69
Joined: September 11, 2012
Reputation:
84
RE: government controlling/monitoring child bearing
July 10, 2015 at 4:11 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 4:08 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: (July 10, 2015 at 4:07 pm)rexbeccarox Wrote: Moved to the appropriate subforum.
Thanks. Sorry again. 
It's ok. No big 
Nolite te bastardes carborundorum.
Posts: 69247
Threads: 3759
Joined: August 2, 2009
Reputation:
259
RE: government controlling/monitoring child bearing
July 10, 2015 at 4:11 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 4:07 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: (July 10, 2015 at 4:03 pm)Minimalist Wrote: Too many of the assholes don't know where the bullets are going.
Mini, I am pro life. Does this mean you think I am an a**hole? 
He's referring to the Gun Nut thread in the politics forum.
I agree with George Carlin about "pro-lifers."
![[Image: george+carlin+blogspot+3.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=3.bp.blogspot.com%2F-IpJ4KHqrCw8%2FT6diCWzSuqI%2FAAAAAAAABs4%2Fvrk7mF7O-pU%2Fs1600%2Fgeorge%2Bcarlin%2Bblogspot%2B3.jpg)
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: government controlling/monitoring child bearing
July 10, 2015 at 4:11 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 4:08 pm)Pyrrho Wrote: If it did not get the desired results, then thinking about more drastic measures would be called for.
What type of "drastic measures" are you referring to? You mean like finding a way to force people to not have kids?
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 6946
Threads: 26
Joined: April 28, 2012
Reputation:
83
RE: government controlling/monitoring child bearing
July 10, 2015 at 4:17 pm
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2015 at 4:24 pm by Cato.)
(July 10, 2015 at 4:11 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: What type of "drastic measures" are you referring to? You mean like finding a way to force people to not have kids?
Indian and Chinese one child policies are tragic when one considers that infanticide is the only way to account for the levels of gender disparity.
Edit: Got curious and looked again. India had only proposed a one-child policy, but it has never been implemented.
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: government controlling/monitoring child bearing
July 10, 2015 at 4:17 pm
(This post was last modified: July 10, 2015 at 4:22 pm by Catholic_Lady.)
(July 10, 2015 at 4:11 pm)Minimalist Wrote: (July 10, 2015 at 4:07 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: Mini, I am pro life. Does this mean you think I am an a**hole?
He's referring to the Gun Nut thread in the politics forum.
I agree with George Carlin about "pro-lifers."
Well I am glad you don't think I am an a**hole.
Saying pro lifers do nothing for the unborn is a bit of a rash and unfair generalization though, don't you think? There are plenty of pro life pregnancy crisis centers that help the women and her baby before and after birth. And there are many pro lifers who involve themselves in or donate to such organizations. As for the killing doctors thing, only 8 abortionists have been killed in the past 40 years. A horrible thing, but still, a rash generalization about an entire group of people... just like everything else on that post. And how can I not like women? I am a woman. And I love being one. :
Just some things to think about.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
Posts: 12231
Threads: 324
Joined: April 14, 2011
Reputation:
140
RE: government controlling/monitoring child bearing
July 10, 2015 at 4:17 pm
All these polls, they're actually giving me a headache.
Posts: 7318
Threads: 75
Joined: April 18, 2015
Reputation:
73
RE: government controlling/monitoring child bearing
July 10, 2015 at 4:22 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 4:17 pm)Napoléon Wrote: All these polls, they're actually giving me a headache.
And there's no bread option either :c
Posts: 12231
Threads: 324
Joined: April 14, 2011
Reputation:
140
RE: government controlling/monitoring child bearing
July 10, 2015 at 4:22 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 4:22 pm)Neimenovic Wrote: And there's no bread option either :c
Fucking disgrace!
Posts: 15452
Threads: 147
Joined: June 15, 2015
Reputation:
88
RE: government controlling/monitoring child bearing
July 10, 2015 at 4:23 pm
(July 10, 2015 at 4:17 pm)Napoléon Wrote: All these polls, they're actually giving me a headache.
Oh here's Napoleon, being quite the butt again....
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
|
