The problem with debating evolution/creation is that biology is a VERY complex subject. Someone like Ken Hamm, for example, could ask, 'If evolution is true, how did woodpeckers evolve?' This isn't a question that can be answered in the one, three, or five minutes usually allowed for responses in a debate. When the biologist in the debate tries to answer, topics like morphology, co-evolution and habitat pressure tend to make audiences glaze over.
Boru
Boru
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax
