I wouldn't debate them, either. The whole point of debating to me has always been to at least consider what the other side is saying, and see how well your arguments hold up under scrutiny and reevaluate your stance accordingly. One side won't even consider what the other one is saying, despite evidence in support of the fact, and the other already has considered it and that's why they think it's hogwash in the first place. What's the point?
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 13, 2024, 8:03 am
Thread Rating:
Dawkins' Debate Rejections
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)