RE: Rapture September 2015
August 20, 2015 at 8:08 pm
(This post was last modified: August 20, 2015 at 8:16 pm by NoFaith2Burn4.)
Randy Carson
Try me.![[Image: nunchuk.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=forums.catholic.com%2Fimages%2Fsmilies%2Fsports%2Fnunchuk.gif)
Ok, Ninja Douchebag - tell me what you know on the story of Lot - tell me what he did when a stranger showed up at his door.
She lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose semen was like that of horses.
Where would something like this have been written?
When King Saul returned from his final battle with the Amalekites, and Samuel saw that there were some surviving women, children, and animals, what did he do?
(August 20, 2015 at 1:02 pm)NoFaith2Burn4 Wrote: What's really weird is how little most Catholics or Protestants really know of their own religion. That Catholic followers never even read their own holy book at all is bizarre.
Try me.
Ok, Ninja Douchebag - tell me what you know on the story of Lot - tell me what he did when a stranger showed up at his door.
(August 20, 2015 at 5:50 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:(August 20, 2015 at 1:02 pm)NoFaith2Burn4 Wrote: What's really weird is how little most Catholics or Protestants really know of their own religion. That Catholic followers never even read their own holy book at all is bizarre.
Try me.
She lusted after her lovers, whose genitals were like those of donkeys and whose semen was like that of horses.
Where would something like this have been written?
(August 20, 2015 at 5:50 pm)Randy Carson Wrote:(August 20, 2015 at 1:02 pm)NoFaith2Burn4 Wrote: What's really weird is how little most Catholics or Protestants really know of their own religion. That Catholic followers never even read their own holy book at all is bizarre.
Try me.
When King Saul returned from his final battle with the Amalekites, and Samuel saw that there were some surviving women, children, and animals, what did he do?
There are two types of ideas: there is fact, and there is non-fact. Facts are determined empirically, i.e, what the King James Version says verbatim is an empirical fact. That it doesn't represent a ghastly mountain of cruel bullshit is non-factual. Therefore, please don't waste other people's precious time trying to spin Bullshit Mountain as gold! 
