(August 30, 2015 at 5:45 pm)Whateverist the White Wrote:(August 30, 2015 at 4:15 pm)Rekeisha Wrote: So why do believe in this? The day before yesterday you said that they are about 100 years out to making abiogenesis work but that means that they have not. Yesterday you say that it isn't happening now so it would seem to me that there is no scientific evidence that abiogenesis actually happens. Am I wrong?
Abiogenesis isn't really a theory, it is merely a name for an unknown natural process. It is simply the assumption that the process when discovered will turn out to have been natural.
Don't forget that your divinity theory is also an unknown process. You don't know whether your god used a deeper understanding of the natural world to create life or whether it was pure magic. Neither of us has any advantage here. The exact means by which the inorganic became organic is not known .. not by us, not by you.
(August 30, 2015 at 4:15 pm)Rekeisha Wrote: So we see Micro evolution but what about Macro evolution. Where are we see this happen? Where do we see genetic information being added to organisms?
evolution
Abiogenesis is not what is meant by macro evolution. Macro evolution is merely a term used to indicate substantial change which the theory of evolution would describe as taking place over a long series of micro mutations.
God may be a theory to you but He isn't to me He is a being. Someone that I have know for many years now. His actions on the cross, His death and resections, give me new life. This is a reality to me because I have experienced the forgiveness of my sins.
It is logical to me that life comes from life and doesn't just spring from nonliving things.