(November 26, 2010 at 4:34 am)Synackaon Wrote: Not to mention that comparing relatively modern technology to much older technology is rather silly when comparing ordnance usage.
In this context it isn't, the point I'm making is that the war that the two superpowers would have fought would have been with the much more capable weapons of the Fifties and Sixties.
The Vietnam war was a "limited" war yet that much more was dropped by the US.
Imagine a full on conflict in Europe, it wouldn't have been nuclear but the end result would have been the same.
![[Image: mybannerglitter06eee094.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i118.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fo112%2Fpussinboots_photos%2FBikes%2Fmybannerglitter06eee094.gif)
If you're not supposed to ride faster than your guardian angel can fly then mine had better get a bloody SR-71.
