(October 4, 2015 at 11:54 pm)TaraJo Wrote: http://www.forbes.com/sites/janetstemwed...-violence/
I've actually heard Republicans say, in the wake of these shootings, "we shouldn't ban guns if we don't have evidence that banning them will reduce violence." I guess this is how they're going to suck some NRA dick and keep that line true: they just block any studies that might prove guns play a role in gun violence and hide behind the second amendment.
I had to read the bolded bit through a few times. Why would you need evidence to conclude than banning guns will reduce gun violence? I'm not a statistician, but if there are no guns about, isn't it going to be pretty difficult to shoot someone with one?
'Let's do a study to see of lack of water will reduce the danger of flooding.'
'Let's do a study to see if lack of sand reduces the amount of sand.'
Come on.
‘I can’t be having with this.’ - Esmeralda Weatherwax