(October 30, 2015 at 12:18 pm)pool Wrote:(October 30, 2015 at 12:08 pm)Rhythm Wrote: So, the big bang is nothing like the firecrackers upon which your observations are centered.....but you're gonna run with it anyway..because it sounds cooler...or are you done?
You think I'm wrong because I said that "This is how particles interact, period." rule existed for particles before the BB.
Quote:Singularities are zones which defy our current understanding of physics. They are thought to exist at the core of "black holes." Black holes are areas of intense gravitational pressure. The pressure is thought to be so intense that finite matter is actually squished into infinite density......
I understand that BB happened from the rapid expansion of a singularity.
Now read the bolded part.
Now do you understand? Why I said what I said? Because you seem to be telling me that a singularity doesn't involve any sort of particles
Edit:
If your point is that you have a better understanding of BBT then you're probably right otherwise I see no point in your posts rather than test what I know about BBT
(October 30, 2015 at 12:44 pm)LostLocke Wrote:(October 30, 2015 at 11:53 am)pool Wrote: Some sort of particles are needed for any sort of explosionExcept the Big Bang wasn't an explosion.
For the BB to occur particles would've needed
No particles needed.
Particles, as we know them in our universe, formed after the BB.
Read the quote above

And I'm sorry for using explosion