RE: Review so far of the Romans study
November 17, 2015 at 10:54 am
(This post was last modified: November 17, 2015 at 10:55 am by Drich.)
(November 17, 2015 at 10:28 am)Rhythm Wrote: Why invite the comments, Drich....why a review, if you have no intention of internalizing those responses you get? Obviously, this question is rhetorical. You can either improve your delivery, or accept your failure as satisfactory. Your call.
prove the delivery of what?
A charge was made that Christian promotes blood shed per the history of the RC church.
To which I said inorder for this to be true you need to provide something in the bible that support these acts. If you can't then it is really easy to identify these acts as non-christian.
Which again point to an abuse of power by wicked men in the church.
The existance of corrupt and wicked men in any institution does not mean the institution itself is corrupt. It just means the hearts of all men no matter how well meaning are still subject to corruption and evil when faced with great personal power.
