Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 19, 2024, 9:15 am

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Review so far of the Romans study
RE: Review so far of the Romans study
(December 17, 2015 at 10:01 am)Drich Wrote: Look sport, Your not in prison anymore, right?

Yet you seem to still feel like you have to be the alpha. I say that because just look at your last post and all you feel like you have to prove. look at how you react when challenged or perceive a threat. At what point do you turn the other cheek? Never? The only people who can't Ever turn the other cheek are those in prison.. Which you have been released from right? Yet here we are what 6 + weeks past the point where I initially slighted you? 2 weeks after you came out of the blue and started asking for homosexual favors? All because I suggested you might have some prison form of PTSD?

Do you not understand the term? It is not a term used to baseless insult someone. If you can not let something like this EVER go then how are your actions not related to a prison trauma?

Again look at your story look at what you had to do to live the way you wanted to live... How can you not be affected by that? Now look at what your doing, when you troll and flame taking your anger from one thread to the next. How is stalking me Not a direct result of the person who you had to become in prison to survive?

But, again are you still in prison? Yet you retain apart of that person who very much is... That my friend is a manfestation of post traumatic stress disorder.

Unless you were a closeted gay/Ass hole who held a grudge for way way too long, before you went to jail.

Look, Scumbag, I'm not only not in prison anymore, I'm not a felon anymore. So fuck off with your implications. You have no understanding whatsoever, but it clearly doesn't stop you from flapping your cocksucker.

I would not have let it go that a person uses rape as a rhetorical device (or worse, a veiled slur) even before I went to prison. What you said was just plain wrong, verging on evil. That doesn't make me "holding a grudge" of some kind, other than disliking you for what you did... it's simply an inexcusable thing that you have done, and the fact that you are perfectly okay with making such a reference, even trying to turn the blame back upon me, tells me you likely have some form of sociopathy. I've seen plenty of those in the past decade. You have no excuse for taking this to the places you have taken it, and it is why I will continue to refer to you, simply, as "scumbag". Don't thank me... you've earned it!

And what the hell is "from one thread to the next"? I read through every thread on this forum, and I comment whenever I feel it's applicable. You're not special... certainly not special enough to "stalk". Get over yourself. Your derisive and abusive tone toward atheists would have drawn my ire when I was in my twenties, just the same as it does today. The idea that I'm "stalking" you is so ridiculous that I feel ridiculous for even responding to it. All I've done is recognize you for the scumbag you are, and taken it upon myself to return your derision until you grow tired of pontificating and go fuck off elsewhere.

The fact that you still think being okay with making a joke as if  I was gay actually means I'm closeted (or, apparently, a rapist) is still mind-boggling to me. Your mind is a quagmire of self-righteousness and prejudice, which is the reason I've taken it upon myself to target you for a little "I bet the Christer is afraid of a few gay references" harassment. And you've fulfilled my expectations of a bigot and then some! 

As I said before, none of this has to do with prison, and it's certainly not an "alpha dominance" thing. It's like I told you before: talking to any Southern man as you have would get your face bashed in, or at least a good attempt at it. In fact, I'd say I've been surprisingly gentle with you, simply asking you politely if you'd enjoy a little "mouth hug" of my wiener. I guess that's what you get when you try to do something nice for a sexually-repressed religious person.

But go ahead, scumbag, imply that I'm actually gay--as if that's an insult; I'd own it proudly if I was!--and mentally unstable. That'll never make up for the fact that you tried to win an argument by referencing prison trauma/rape, like the scumbag you are. We all come here to argue, and to try to win arguments, but there's a line. You didn't cross it, you leaped right over it. And I will continue to drive you until you get the fuck away from the people I like so much, whom I seek to protect by engaging you and your abusiveness.

In the words of Ezekiel, I will "stand in the gap and make up the hedge" against you, as long as you insist on speaking to us the way you do. If you decide to turn into a human being, like the Christians here with real human empathy, who actually know how to talk to us like people and whom I hold in great regard, then I will treat you accordingly... but keep in mind, I'm not a Christian. I have no reason to "turn the other cheek". I try to be at peace with others, unless they attack. If you strike, expect to be struck in return (in this case, verbally). Cease acting like a scumbag, and you will no longer be treated like one.

Until then, by all means, crow a bit more about your moral and emotional superiority, Scumbag. I can't wait to hear your next deflection.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost

I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.

Reply



Messages In This Thread
Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 9, 2015 at 3:11 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by LastPoet - November 9, 2015 at 3:13 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by abaris - November 9, 2015 at 3:16 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Cyberman - November 9, 2015 at 3:21 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 9, 2015 at 3:40 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TheRocketSurgeon - November 9, 2015 at 4:02 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 9, 2015 at 4:08 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Simon Moon - November 9, 2015 at 4:13 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 9, 2015 at 4:26 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Wyrd of Gawd - November 10, 2015 at 7:32 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 10, 2015 at 7:50 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 11, 2015 at 10:54 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 11, 2015 at 12:56 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Cyberman - November 11, 2015 at 2:26 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 11, 2015 at 3:49 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 11, 2015 at 4:15 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 11, 2015 at 4:57 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 11, 2015 at 6:15 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 13, 2015 at 12:50 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 13, 2015 at 3:19 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 11, 2015 at 9:59 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 11, 2015 at 12:49 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 11, 2015 at 3:14 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 11, 2015 at 4:11 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 11, 2015 at 4:54 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 11, 2015 at 6:03 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 13, 2015 at 12:47 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 14, 2015 at 12:37 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 16, 2015 at 11:39 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Athene - November 11, 2015 at 7:17 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Wyrd of Gawd - November 11, 2015 at 8:38 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 9, 2015 at 4:40 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by abaris - November 9, 2015 at 4:43 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 9, 2015 at 4:55 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 9, 2015 at 4:44 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by abaris - November 9, 2015 at 4:49 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 9, 2015 at 5:50 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 9, 2015 at 5:49 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 9, 2015 at 7:26 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by KevinM1 - November 9, 2015 at 8:35 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Neo-Scholastic - November 10, 2015 at 12:45 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 10, 2015 at 12:47 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 10, 2015 at 1:03 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by KevinM1 - November 10, 2015 at 2:22 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Cyberman - November 10, 2015 at 2:54 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by abaris - November 10, 2015 at 5:09 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TheRocketSurgeon - November 10, 2015 at 10:20 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by loganonekenobi - November 9, 2015 at 6:21 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by KevinM1 - November 9, 2015 at 6:58 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 9, 2015 at 8:47 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Grandizer - November 9, 2015 at 8:51 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Cyberman - November 9, 2015 at 9:21 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 9, 2015 at 10:01 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Cyberman - November 9, 2015 at 10:45 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by KevinM1 - November 9, 2015 at 9:03 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by drfuzzy - November 9, 2015 at 9:47 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TheRocketSurgeon - November 9, 2015 at 10:17 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 11, 2015 at 10:32 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by robvalue - November 10, 2015 at 4:37 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 10, 2015 at 5:07 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 10, 2015 at 1:05 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by robvalue - November 10, 2015 at 5:09 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 10, 2015 at 5:16 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by drfuzzy - November 10, 2015 at 11:19 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by robvalue - November 10, 2015 at 11:37 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by robvalue - November 10, 2015 at 12:50 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 10, 2015 at 4:12 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 10, 2015 at 7:49 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 11, 2015 at 11:42 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 11, 2015 at 11:54 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Reforged - November 11, 2015 at 3:42 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 11, 2015 at 3:50 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Reforged - November 11, 2015 at 5:48 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 11, 2015 at 3:51 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 11, 2015 at 4:49 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 11, 2015 at 6:18 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by loganonekenobi - November 11, 2015 at 10:46 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 13, 2015 at 3:15 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by loganonekenobi - November 14, 2015 at 7:04 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 16, 2015 at 10:41 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Wyrd of Gawd - November 13, 2015 at 12:19 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by robvalue - November 14, 2015 at 1:24 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Grandizer - November 14, 2015 at 1:35 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 16, 2015 at 12:16 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 16, 2015 at 12:11 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by robvalue - November 14, 2015 at 1:45 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 14, 2015 at 1:57 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 16, 2015 at 12:23 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 14, 2015 at 1:49 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 16, 2015 at 12:18 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Wyrd of Gawd - November 16, 2015 at 12:38 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Grandizer - November 14, 2015 at 3:24 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 16, 2015 at 12:32 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 14, 2015 at 3:44 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 16, 2015 at 12:34 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Crossless1 - November 16, 2015 at 12:44 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by robvalue - November 15, 2015 at 5:30 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 16, 2015 at 1:05 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by The Grand Nudger - November 16, 2015 at 3:23 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 16, 2015 at 6:32 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 16, 2015 at 3:26 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 16, 2015 at 3:50 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 16, 2015 at 7:43 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Athene - November 16, 2015 at 8:06 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 17, 2015 at 10:47 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Pat Mustard - December 4, 2015 at 4:29 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 14, 2015 at 10:20 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by jenny1972 - November 16, 2015 at 3:31 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 16, 2015 at 6:24 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by The Grand Nudger - November 16, 2015 at 3:52 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 16, 2015 at 6:33 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by loganonekenobi - November 16, 2015 at 6:55 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 17, 2015 at 10:21 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by The Grand Nudger - November 17, 2015 at 10:28 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 17, 2015 at 10:54 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Cyberman - November 17, 2015 at 10:41 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Grandizer - November 17, 2015 at 4:31 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Hmmm? - November 17, 2015 at 4:44 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Crossless1 - November 17, 2015 at 5:03 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TubbyTubby - November 17, 2015 at 10:43 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by The Grand Nudger - November 17, 2015 at 10:52 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by The Grand Nudger - November 17, 2015 at 4:56 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Hmmm? - November 17, 2015 at 5:16 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Athene - November 17, 2015 at 5:22 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Neo-Scholastic - November 17, 2015 at 5:43 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Cyberman - November 17, 2015 at 7:56 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 19, 2015 at 11:22 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Crossless1 - November 17, 2015 at 5:49 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Hmmm? - November 17, 2015 at 6:34 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 18, 2015 at 12:16 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Cato - November 18, 2015 at 12:46 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Crossless1 - November 18, 2015 at 6:22 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Hmmm? - November 18, 2015 at 12:38 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 18, 2015 at 2:01 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by loganonekenobi - November 19, 2015 at 12:41 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 19, 2015 at 10:49 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Cyberman - November 19, 2015 at 12:18 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 19, 2015 at 1:08 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 19, 2015 at 4:03 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 19, 2015 at 4:17 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 19, 2015 at 1:07 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Cyberman - November 19, 2015 at 1:13 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - November 19, 2015 at 2:14 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Crossless1 - November 19, 2015 at 3:55 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Cyberman - November 19, 2015 at 5:24 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 23, 2015 at 11:38 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by loganonekenobi - November 23, 2015 at 8:31 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - November 24, 2015 at 12:34 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - November 23, 2015 at 11:32 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 1, 2015 at 10:40 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - December 1, 2015 at 12:12 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by dyresand - December 1, 2015 at 12:55 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - December 1, 2015 at 1:13 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by dyresand - December 1, 2015 at 1:57 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TheRocketSurgeon - December 1, 2015 at 1:01 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Crossless1 - December 1, 2015 at 1:14 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 1, 2015 at 2:16 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TheRocketSurgeon - December 1, 2015 at 6:03 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 4, 2015 at 10:56 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Joods - December 1, 2015 at 3:31 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 1, 2015 at 4:35 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Cyberman - December 1, 2015 at 8:12 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - December 1, 2015 at 9:40 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - December 1, 2015 at 4:44 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - December 1, 2015 at 9:31 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TheRocketSurgeon - December 4, 2015 at 11:19 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by dyresand - December 4, 2015 at 11:36 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Anomalocaris - December 4, 2015 at 1:49 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 4, 2015 at 1:51 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by dyresand - December 4, 2015 at 2:03 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 4, 2015 at 1:29 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by dyresand - December 4, 2015 at 1:36 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by drfuzzy - December 4, 2015 at 2:12 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Whateverist - December 4, 2015 at 12:55 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 4, 2015 at 1:33 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Grandizer - December 4, 2015 at 2:10 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Whateverist - December 4, 2015 at 1:36 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - December 4, 2015 at 4:36 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by loganonekenobi - December 12, 2015 at 12:46 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 14, 2015 at 10:26 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TheRocketSurgeon - December 14, 2015 at 10:35 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 15, 2015 at 10:53 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Nay_Sayer - December 16, 2015 at 8:34 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 15, 2015 at 10:53 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TheRocketSurgeon - December 15, 2015 at 11:08 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Crossless1 - December 15, 2015 at 11:20 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TheRocketSurgeon - December 16, 2015 at 8:27 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 16, 2015 at 11:34 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by KevinM1 - December 16, 2015 at 12:02 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 16, 2015 at 12:20 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by KevinM1 - December 16, 2015 at 1:17 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 16, 2015 at 3:38 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Minimalist - December 16, 2015 at 12:59 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 16, 2015 at 3:43 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TheRocketSurgeon - December 16, 2015 at 4:47 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 17, 2015 at 10:01 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TheRocketSurgeon - December 17, 2015 at 9:07 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by drfuzzy - December 18, 2015 at 1:06 am
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by Drich - December 18, 2015 at 12:08 pm
RE: Review so far of the Romans study - by TheRocketSurgeon - December 18, 2015 at 12:17 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  What Luther didn't know about Romans 1,1-17 SeniorCitizen 1 531 November 20, 2023 at 11:02 am
Last Post: BrianSoddingBoru4
  How far reaching are God's powers? Fake Messiah 332 29973 November 25, 2020 at 3:14 pm
Last Post: The Grand Nudger
  Evangelicals, Trump and a Quick Bible Study DeistPaladin 52 6581 November 9, 2020 at 3:20 pm
Last Post: downbeatplumb
  Who goes to hell - as far as those pious Bible Christians are concerned? Dundee 71 8940 June 14, 2020 at 12:41 pm
Last Post: Paleophyte
  Bibe Study 2: Questionable Morality Rhondazvous 30 3771 May 27, 2019 at 12:23 pm
Last Post: Vicki Q
  Bible Study: The God who Lies and Deceives Rhondazvous 50 7235 May 24, 2019 at 5:52 pm
Last Post: Aegon
  Atheist Bible Study 1: Genesis GrandizerII 614 87866 March 9, 2019 at 8:38 pm
Last Post: Bucky Ball
  Far right Catholic group worried about being banned. Jehanne 14 2372 August 24, 2018 at 9:08 am
Last Post: Abaddon_ire
  So It Seems That This Jesus Freak Corporation's Religious Beliefs Only Go So Far Minimalist 11 2624 July 6, 2017 at 1:24 pm
Last Post: Minimalist
  Biblical Christianity 101, a study of the book of Romans Drich 633 114482 December 14, 2015 at 11:46 pm
Last Post: KevinM1



Users browsing this thread: 6 Guest(s)