RE: My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument
December 23, 2015 at 2:12 pm
(This post was last modified: December 23, 2015 at 2:14 pm by Mohammed - Muslim and Proud.)
(December 23, 2015 at 2:11 pm)Pandæmonium Wrote:(December 23, 2015 at 2:06 pm)Mohammed - Muslim and Proud Wrote: There are questions that you haven't thought of, and they are much harder for scientists to answer.
"How exactly do you know things that are too advanced for science?" Is that a serious question? If we cannot observe God, and he is outside space-time, then it is of course a topic which is too advanced for science.
Your argument is self defeating. What evidence do you have for your claims, specifically that a god exists and that it is out of 'space time'?
Can you observe that God is in space? no..
Therefore it is safe to conclude that God is out of space.
(December 23, 2015 at 2:12 pm)Cecelia Wrote:(December 23, 2015 at 2:09 pm)Chad32 Wrote: The problem with the argument is that you can't demand that everything need a creator, then say your preferred answer doesn't also need a creator. If something can exist without needing a creator, then why does the universe need a creator?
If God is the only thing that doesn't need a creator, then still wherever God came from would need a creator. Even if God just POPPED into existence, he'd have to pop somewhere. What created that somewhere?
Well, again.. our minds cannot handle this, because it is too complicated, because we can not observe it. Just like how we cannot imagine the 4th dimension, there are of course more dimensions, that we are not aware of.
