(December 26, 2015 at 4:29 pm)Simon Moon Wrote:(December 26, 2015 at 4:26 pm)Delicate Wrote: Well I have no interest in learning from people who haven't mastered the rudiments of critical thinking.
I'll concede that much.
This applies equally to theists who don't know how to think. I don't want to learn from them.
So...
Once again we at the point where it is time for you to present your evidence (demonstrable, verifiable, repeatable, falsifiable), and show us how you have applied critical thinking to said evidence in order to determine that your god exists.
What are you waiting for?
Well, I'll be happy to do that. But there's a problem. The kind of evidence you're asking for is naively scientific. It fails to take into account non-scientific, non-experimental evidence (eg historical) and non-evidential (ie rational) bases of justification.
I'd like to make a case for a holistic (as in wide-ranging and multifaceted) as opposed to scientistic approach to justified beliefs.
It's worth pointing out that many intelligent atheists reject scientism, and rejecting scientism doesn't entail rejecting science.
To make my case, scientism must first be demolished.