My Rebuttal to Dawkins Argument

[robvalue]

It is perfectly justified to ask what created god if the premise of an argument is that everything needs a creator.

Further thought:

When someone defines something that doesn't need a creator, after stating everything needs a creator, all they are showing is that their initial premise is wrong. It's self defeating.

Of course we have desperate attempts to smuggle things in, by essentially saying "everything that isn't God needs a creator" which is begging the question.