(February 11, 2016 at 1:48 pm)Drich Wrote:You are the one who cast the first stone here buddy boy, you questioned my knowledge of history, YOU, a person who still believes in the biblical flood. So forgive me if I put your knowledge of history as being of dubious value.(February 11, 2016 at 1:26 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: I just said my knowledge was better than yours. This is not much of a brag. A bit like like saying I'm less of a dick than Donald Trump.
The point you fail to understand is that the only legit reason you would have to sum up and announce your own evaluation, it is because you don't have a fair representation of your work out there to judge your abilities.
Now in as much history that has been talked about in this forum in the last few years, if you don't feel you can be judged on your merits alone, still admits to a deficiency... However this deficiency can't be about the volume of your work to be evaluated. (as youve been a long time member who has weigh in on several different subjects.) This speaks to content, or the lack there of.
Hence, the need for the proclamation/reassurance check you are asking from your peers, and that supports my initial assertion.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.