My case against Creationism and Infinite regression

[robvalue]

Thank you, very good points

The problem with simplistic philosophical arguments that are meant to prove something about reality is they assume we do know, 100%. And the conclusions rest entirely on this being the case. But we have no way of knowing whether they are true or not, so all we have is (at best) a valid logical argument, that may or may not be sound. Often, it's not even valid though and resorts to special pleading.