RE: Can't prove the supernatural God
May 25, 2016 at 1:09 pm
(This post was last modified: May 25, 2016 at 1:12 pm by SteveII.)
(May 25, 2016 at 9:11 am)robvalue Wrote: If Mark was supposed to be an editor, he must be the worst one imaginable since he omitted the most important part of the whole story. It had to be added in later because even people at that time could see what he had written was not convincing enough.
Why do you think it was added later? There are many that think that he simply included an earlier narrative in with his writing. There, all fixed. Good editor again.