Can't prove the supernatural God

[Mister Agenda]

You left out: The NT books represent the claim fine, it just happens that the claim they represented wasn't true. Modern people are not that much better than the Ancients when it comes to believing that hearsay claims that have had plenty of opportunity to be corrupted by the 'Chinese whispers' effect are true. People don't have to by lying to be wrong.

And many people are happy to make shit up for the thrill of watching others believe it.

You are alleging that the writers of the 27 books of the NT believed something that was false (in spite of 3 of them being eyewitnesses) as well as that first generation that would have been contemporaries of Jesus. I am going out on a limb, but I think you don't have any evidence for that other than your belief that miracles cannot happen. So, we are back to miracles didn't happen because miracles can't happen. Circular.

Yes, people believe false things that they are willing to die for all the time. Fanatic belief has never been a defense against simply being wrong.

We don't know miracles didn't happen. What everybody has been trying to tell you is that even if they did, the evidence being presented for believing that they really happened is not just weak, but incredibly weak.

BTW, who are the three eyewitnesses and what, exactly, did they witness that has you so impressed?