Yet another reality question!

[robvalue]

I take option 1. I want to be in control.

But does it really matter if you're happier in option 2?

(I'm playing devil's advocate)

I do see the apparent irrationality in my answer, and it's interesting to me. It might be to do with me being unable to properly conceptualize the idea of being constantly happy without context. Also, I value the anticipation and variety very highly.

And as has been noted, this option does include the other option. I can decide to "switch over" at any time just by removing context and cranking up the happiness to max all the time.

The answer does still seem irrational even after my explanation. I would however give up this life (ignoring the morality in that decision) for a life of constant happiness where I don't get to do anything. But I had two choices, I'd go with the one where I can control my actions and happiness.