Someone stole the body!

[Godscreated]

 

---

 You keep harping on this same thing and all you do is post from biased sites on the net. You do no research of your own and you never go to Christian sites to learn. When I went to the site you posted the first thing to come up was the genealogy of Jesus, showing how it's contradictory.
 
Let's look at he genealogy of scripture, here is the genealogy my Matthew and the one in 1 Chronicles 3:10-12, these are the very same genealogies.

 1 Chronicles 3;10-12                                                           Matthew 1:8-9
     Asa                                                                                      Asa
     Jehoshaphat                                                                        Jehoshaphat
     Joram                                                                                  Joram
     Ahaziah (Uzziah)                                                                    Uzziah
     Joash
     Amaziah
     Azariah
     Jotham                                                                                 Jotham
     Ahaz                                                                                     Ahaz
     Hezekiah                                                                               Hezekiah
     ect.                                                                                       ect.  
 As you see Matthew didn't write down all the genealogy, Matthew when saying Uzziah was the father of Jotham it can mean he was the father who lead to Jotham. Just as the Bible says that Abraham was the father of a nation or the angel said to Joseph, "Joseph son of David." This was the tradition of the ancient times to refer to a man as the father of a great great great grandson or even more distant. Matthew had a reason to eliminate the names, but what he didn't do was to write them out of order. So there is nothing wrong with Matthew's written genealogy, he for reasons unknown to us didn't include all the names. You need to remember that he had access to the genealogies at the temple and could have written them down as recorded in earlier manuscripts. So in the end there's no contradiction with the two, as I stated previously the writers didn't necessarily put down all the facts because they didn't feel it necessary for the times.

GC

---

Paul said that the genealogies were BS and not worth arguing about.

 Proof please.

GC