Thomas
Point 1: they wouldn't be right or wrong, but most Christians would disagree with them. They would be an exception to the rule, and they would be contradicting the Bible so it would be on them to demonstrate that they are correct.
Point 2: it doesn't matter if I can prove that someone didn't because the burden of proof is on the person making the claim - until you can demonstrate that a person DID go and add all the bad bits to the Bible, no one else is rationally justified in believing it. So, I won't believe it unless you can prove it.
Point 1: they wouldn't be right or wrong, but most Christians would disagree with them. They would be an exception to the rule, and they would be contradicting the Bible so it would be on them to demonstrate that they are correct.
Point 2: it doesn't matter if I can prove that someone didn't because the burden of proof is on the person making the claim - until you can demonstrate that a person DID go and add all the bad bits to the Bible, no one else is rationally justified in believing it. So, I won't believe it unless you can prove it.
