(June 17, 2016 at 12:50 pm)Thomas Kelly252525 Wrote:(June 17, 2016 at 12:05 pm)Veritas_Vincit Wrote: --Thomas, I think we're done. Your responses show that you aren't even reading and understanding what I have said. You are just throwing up a lot of deflecting questions to avoiding the key point.--
What may you think proves that ? What do you think about the burden of proof ? Do you expect me to be accused and not point out that there is a need to prove ?
--I'm starting to wonder if you are just trolling here.--
All I may do is post my words and let people judge.
--It all comes down to one point - either you have evidence for your claim that the Bible was tampered with or you don't. Until you can present some evidence for this, then it's not worth further consideration.--
Do you think I've not been willing to start proving all along ? Do you think you accused me ? Do you think there is a burden of proof ?
If you continue the same as that above I may choose not to answer you, not because of being annoyed but because sometimes it's not to people's advantage if I answer.
Veritas Vincit, you may look at my answers above.
You have just proved my point, as anyone reading this will see for themselves, and we're done.