Part on Feminisim.

[Lemonvariable72]

Wow that first paragraph is cringy as fuck. Granted the op isn't the most coherent but dismissing his argument with no evidence, because he is young is just cringy as a fuck. [...]

Argument? What argument?

As for men getting the same protection under the law, bullshit. In a lot of states and countries including isreal and India the only way a woman can ever be charged with rape is if is an accomplice to a man. I can tell you from experience that male victims of sexual assault are treated as a punchline.

And that's the fault of... feminists? Women? I'm not sure what your point is. Sexism is a problem, that doesn't make feminism in any way invalid.

There is also the Duluth model which is now law where the police are trained to see the male as the perpetrater in domestic situations, hence in places like england where they have to take some one right away it is nearly always the man. Again the work of feminists.

Is it? Citation, please. I can't help but notice you're presenting no evidence. Also - aren't domestic abuse statistics heavily dominated by male perpetrators? Or are you saying husbands physically assaulted by women are as common as battered wives? And how do you know about police training?

Now let me ask this, what is feminisms solution for the treatment of women in more backwards places? How does feminism propose we tackle those issues? I know how I would, but what does feminism propose?

I don't know. Ask the Pope of Feminism, or something.

The reason I ask is because a lot of those countries are Muslim, and I have seen feminists expend great effort defending Islam.

I don't care what you've seen. Defending islam has nothing to do with feminism.

Now for your last point. I actually think your both right. There are things you can do and teach people that will reduce rape. IE don't leave your drink unattended at parties.

Or perhaps - don't be a pathetic creep trying to have sex with men/women you just met? Don't stick your d*ck in crazy? Predatory approach to sex (like pick-up artistry) is not something to admire, or imitate? There are plenty of things dumb people could learn, in order to avoid a lot of trouble...

The real question is how far are you willing to go. For example, as long as you have freedom of thought, you will have racist people.

Likewise I am certainly anti-rape and I do have reforms I would like to see to help rape victims, but I not willing to give up my right to the presumption of innocence or the right to a trial by a jury of my peers.

I don't know who's trying to wrestle those rights away from you, but I don't believe it's feminism.

Before you laugh, feminists in new Zealand tried to set up a Inquisitorial justice system for rape victims. And they want the same thing here in Canada in light of the ghomeshi trial.

I see... But please, do tell, since you seem versed in this matter - that system they tried to set up in New Zealand - was it only supposed to be applicable to the female victims of rape and male perpetrators?

I do apologize for the format of of this response but here is the evidence for my claims

m.jpost.com/Israel/Womens-groups-Cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape


https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duluth_model

Edit: oh and if you go by the CDC numbers for domestic abuse, its about 60-40 men to women.

There is a tl;Dr video as a response to Steve shives where he goes over the numbers in a lot of detail. I will link it when I'm off my phone.