(September 24, 2016 at 6:47 am)abaris Wrote:(September 24, 2016 at 5:53 am)RobertE Wrote: Show me my posts where I have stated anything about Breitbart, Socialist Workers Party or anything of that ilk.
Read it in context. The kudos you give, right before mentioning Breitbart. That's in answer to Bella's post defending Breitbart and the Free Republic sources and you instantly giving kudos. Meaning, she said something you can agree upon. So, guilty by association, I would say. Since that was the only thing she said in one of her usual oneliners. Paraphrasing quite losely: "That's implying these aren't serious sources". Followed by your kudos.
Also, mentioning the Guardian in the same breath as the above is like comparing the Times with an extreme rightwing blog. They may lean to the left or the right. But they are held accountable by law and do their checks. They may give their articles some spin in certain directions, but neither one of them stoops to the level of Breitbart, Alex Jones, the Free Republic or any leftwing blog.
I ruled out The Guardian and The Daily Mail since they are biased to the left and right respectively.
