Why do the ritors ask for Justice?

[Drich]

When do you live in the late 90s?
Seriously, that lady cop who shot the pcp guy has been arrested and is charged with manslaughter. If their was a blue wall of silence, how then how is this lady cop in jail before the rioters can even be bussed to Colorado?

Video evidence.

me: When do you live?

you: Video evidence...

Me: Seriously, that lady cop who shot the pcp guy has been arrested and is charged with manslaughter. If their was a blue wall of silence, how then how is this lady cop in jail before the rioters can even be bussed to Colorado?

But if you need a link I'll see what I can find.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-jdLhnxY7c

The MMPI-2 seems to be the gold standard:
http://www.copuniversity.com/blog/what-mmpi-test/
Your article also mentions the MMPI-2

What is the MMPI-2
http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/59/2/135.full

Do you need me to keep going? You've got two list that say nearly all law enforcement uses psych evalus/testing to determine mental fitness of a candidate, and you have a link showing how in depth this test is by a reputable source. (meaning a well establish learning institution gives an exact break down of the test and an endorsement, verse a liberal rag telling you it's obsolete test.)

That's not what we were discussing. I will "cop" to making a error, in failing in to note that you were simply referring to testing in your post above, when were actually speaking of psychological evaluation. Our previous exchange below:

Drich wrote:These are completely unfair assessments.
Did you know a psych eval is performed for all potential recruits and each and everytime an officer's integrity is questioned? some departments even have their guys checked out one a year...

Thena wrote:
I never said all officers display those those traits. Some of them do, though; They're the ones that are part of the problem.

Additionally, all police officers are not required to undergo psychological evaluations. And currently, there's no nationwide standardization in place for administration or content of such evaluations. It literally varies from department to department.

The MMPI-2 is just a personality test. It's a single tool can be utilized in conjunction others in the process of psychological assessment/evaluation, not a psychological evaluation in and of itself.  My statement just above is accurate. 

Ahhhh, here it is.. You think the MMPI-2 is a personality test... You didn't read how the Oxford journal Identifies the test.. Why would you when by a simply dismissal you think you have the upper hand in the argument. Here's the problem.. The oxford Journal of medicine does not agree with your trivial assessment. Here is some of what you pver looked in the link I provided (THAT YOU ASKED FOR)

The test developers Hathaway and McKinley used an empirical test construction technique to develop the MMPI. This involved basing the test scales (for example the hypochondriasis scale) on the actual test items that differentiate people with hypochondriasis from ‘normals’. Often, the questions that do this most reliably are not concerned with health issues as such. This has two advantages. First, it makes it very difficult for subjects to ‘fake’ responses, deny problems or give a particular impression. Second, the MMPI-2 is based on empirical research and not on a clinician's assumptions about what answers indicate particular personality traits....

....The MMPI-2 was validated using a normative sample of 2600 adults. There are ∼10 000 published papers using the MMPI-2 and this pool is added to by hundreds of papers every year. A symptom validity scale (FBS) has been added to the inventory in recent years to help exclude symptom exaggeration and has been reported as having very low false-positive rates.

The data from MMPI-2 assessments are particularly useful in occupational health settings in complex presentations where doubt as to what is really wrong with the patient exists. For example, the MMPI-2 should normally be able to detect unconsciously somatizing or consciously malingering in patients [1]. The MMPI-2 can also be used to assess psychological stability in workers in ‘high-risk’ professions such as airline pilots, police or workers in the nuclear power industry [2–4].

Seem to me This test according to the Oxford Journal of Medicine identifies this test as the gold standard to determining one's physiological well being, and not just a personality test as you have identified...

So looks like someone has some "copping" to do... As this is indeed considered a Psych Eval...
Taken from the second sentence if you need it spelled out for you:
"It is the most widely used psychometric test for measuring adult psychopathology in the world."
(If you think you can argue this then please look up the words "psychometric & psychopathology" before you argue the point I am making)

Drich wrote:
The problem here is the black community at large is raised to believe they must be alpha males all the time. The want to dominate and be in control, which is in direct violation of every cops mandate on the street. 

And....

Drich wrote:
If you were punched hit or kicked by a certain segment of the population almost everytime you had to confront them would you treat them any differently?
Truth is i would. Why? I am not a stupid person and I want to make sure I go home to my family every night, and if that means i make a mistake and offend a few people, then f-them.

Thena wrote:

*My highlighting, for emphasis.

Clearly, you felt that it was unfair for me conclude that it's LIKELY you deem it necessary to adopt a tough, zero-tolerance policy when dealing with "the Negroes". I don't know what to say, other than your words were my guide.

Drich
If they were then why aren't they in their proper context? Why did you have to heavily edit my words to fabricate a point? If what I said was on the surface, and you are accurately representing what I said, then why not establish the context in which those words were spoken? Why do you hide from the context, why did you omit 1/2 the argument that frames what I said? and only cut up and display the parts of my response then pair it with another cut up quote and display them together???

It's called "quoting", crybaby. 

No Quoting refers to providing contextual context inorder to determine what the author's original intention is.

You were quoting out of context. this is akin to cut and pasting random thoughts together so you can frame out a narrative that is not consistent with the authors thoughts.

How broken must your arguement be if you have to cut and paste my words to gether to villify me? If what I am saying is wrong then why can you use my contextual arguement in it's entireity? When I quote you I quote everything why? because everything you say is broken. I want to make sure you understand that I am addressing everything you have to say. I don't have to cut and paste your work together to make you wrong or to frame you out to be wicked... You are on your own. You want the independence to fight law and order if you are a certain color/race. that makes you against the melting pot society we are in favor of up holding and up lifting people with certain skin pigmentation. So again, I quote everything you have to say about that because there is nothing redeemable here. Nothing of that is good. I don't change your words or what you mean just to make you look bad. Which is the wicked thing you did to me. (look up the word wicked if you think you can argue my use of that word)
 

Just because I didn't quote the length your entire post (yes...they were from the exact same post), doesn't mean that your words taken out of context. The subject of those quotes from post #258, were the practice of pre-determining behavior, and why you believe police officers are justified in applying sweeping generalizations in treating all black males as threats; all in line with the topic at hand. What you actually take issue with, is the ugliness that stands out as result of my highlighting your most blatantly despicable comments. If you don't "like" the way truth looks, then drop the phony outrage and do something about it: Take it up with your conscience.

No my words were not about predetermining behavior.


BTW: I'm putting the rest of my reply to this crap in a separate post, in order to make it more manageable to read/respond to.
[/quote]
Again, My comment made was about numbers. In that black men are arrested and convicted of more violent crime than any other segment of the population. So again given this fact, the numbers of violent take downs by cops is going to be higher. Not because they are black but because that is simply the nature of violent crime.
Getting arrest for fighting... then more than likely 'fighting' is your goto tool in your tool box. So when the police confront, someone who's go to 'tool' is to fight then it is not likely that compliance is high on his list of things to do.



Now back to how I prefaced the quote you cut out of context:

If this were just a matter of race then black cops would not be shooting black suspects. However it is black officers who shoot blacks suspects are a far greater ratio than white cops.

Now if this is about race, then why do black cops shoot more black suspects at a higher percentage than white cops?

If this is about coming to a conclusion of how a black man will act during an arrest prompting an over reaction by police (suggesting that race is the Only Trigger to hash treatment of black men) then why do black officers shoot and kill black men at a higher percentage than white officers?

Here's a thought... maybe what I was saying about the culture pushing black men to be alphas in ever situation antagonizes a very unstable situation, and rather than work with the officer to De-escalate the situation, the primary objective is to control the situation... which almost always results in someone getting beaten by cops or shot by them...

Theena..
Seriously when did society make it OK to fight a cop... that is what you are arguing. You/The men in whom you rally behind think they should forgo due process and true justice so they can do what they will when they will it.

When did it become immoral to you to yield to authority society places in police officers??