RE: One of the worst chick tracts ever
October 31, 2016 at 9:15 pm
(This post was last modified: October 31, 2016 at 9:16 pm by GrandizerII.)
(October 29, 2016 at 10:22 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(October 29, 2016 at 10:02 pm)chimp3 Wrote: You don't see what others see. Your too busy trying to be proven correct. Good luck!
The point of the tracts is to persuade people to repent (which means turn away from) of what they are doing and believe on Jesus Christ, he's not just telling stories for the sake of telling stories, they usually involve different subjects that may relate to a situation that someone is in.
That being said, what if a person that is actively abusing a child reads the "Lisa" tract and it causes him to stop what he's doing and seek help? That's a good thing, right?
That's the whole idea behind the tracts... that just maybe somewhere, one can change someones life.
I may not agree with Jack chick on everything but I see what he was trying to accomplish.
Fuck superficial change. Anyone can become "born again" just by praying a few words and feeling good about it for a while. But so what? Where's the accountability? The apology to the child? The acknowledgement that their child is still hurt by what they did to her? The guarantee that it will never happen to her ever again? This is a dangerous tract because it sends a very dangerous message to predators that all they need to do to "fix" this is pray to Jesus and be "saved". Fuck that. The message instead should be to take accountability and send oneself to prison willingly if they are truly sorry about having molested their child (but it is doubtful that they would be sorry enough to ever do that).
