(November 4, 2016 at 4:39 am)Mariosep Wrote: I like to make a confession, this will annoy you, but it is good for us all, namely:
As I see you to be to all appearances harboring a self-inserted chip into your brain, by which you block your mind from intelligent thinking on truths, facts, logic, and the history of ideas,
I laughed, Out.... Loud!
Since you're such an expert on the history of ideas, how about you answer my question?
"How and When did humanity first come across the concept of a creator god?"
(November 4, 2016 at 4:39 am)Mariosep Wrote: see if you can comprehend and tell me what you understand of the statement below from yours truly, as follows:
“The default status of things in the totality of reality is existence.”
Nice word salad...
Let me squeeze it out: Things in reality exist.
You know?... you're on to something... it's called... wait for it... "Synonyms"!
I think it was a French guy who coined this kind of phrase, a Monsieur de La Palice, from where came the "term lapalissade meaning an utterly obvious truth—i.e. a truism or tautology."
(November 4, 2016 at 4:39 am)Mariosep Wrote: My impression is that you go away from the thoughts I am trying to make you comprehend in my messages in this forum, in this thread of mine:
”I am a theist, what do you think of my proof for God existing?”
I don't know how many different ways there can be to tell you the same thing: your so called "proof" proves almost nothing.
It proves that your concept of god exists within your mind. It proves that such a concept can be put into words. And that's it.
Your insistence that you have proved something else with that "proof" does hint at how your mind operates... and I'm afraid to tell you, it does not bode well for humanity.
Reality cares not for your concepts.
Reality cares for what is, in existence... like you enjoy saying so much, outside of your mind, outside of words... outside of any representation.
